<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Watershed tools very slow in ArcMap 10.7.1 in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61442#M854</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Molly,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry to hear that you are having performance issues with the Snap Pour Point and Watershed tools. Could you please share the sample datasets that are causing this issue and I can investigate further.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Snap Pour Point tool,&lt;BR /&gt;1) Input pour point (Raster or feature)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input accumulation raster (Raster)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Snap distance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Pour point field&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Watershed tool,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Input flow direction raster&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input pour point data (Is this the output from the Snap Pour Point tool? If so, you don't need to provide this)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Pour point field&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using &lt;STRONG&gt;any environment settings?&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Such as &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/environment-settings/parallel-processing-factor.htm"&gt;Parallel Processing Factor&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, could you also provide any information on the machine configuration you are using? &lt;BR /&gt;OS Name:&lt;BR /&gt;Processor:&lt;BR /&gt;Memory (RAM):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk space and type (SSD or HDD):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Neeraj Rajasekar | Spatial Analyst Product Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-01-02T19:14:04Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Watershed tools very slow in ArcMap 10.7.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61441#M853</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Has anyone else noticed this in ArcMap 10.7? &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a custom .pyt toolbox that uses snap pour point and watershed tools to create a local watershed for user input sites. For the last 3 years, it has consistently run, taking about 90 seconds each time - I've used it thousands of times. Since my upgrade to ArcMap 10.7, the custom tool now takes 50 minutes to run. I included reporting to see what was going on and I discovered it was taking nearly 15 minutes to snap pour points and 33 minutes to delineate the watershed consistently for every input site I tried.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried running the snap pour point tool manually from the toolbox and it also took much longer than expected, around 9 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Is anyone else having trouble with the speed of the watershed tools in ArcMap 10.7? Did something change?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 18:26:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61441#M853</guid>
      <dc:creator>MollyMoore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-02T18:26:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Watershed tools very slow in ArcMap 10.7.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61442#M854</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Molly,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Sorry to hear that you are having performance issues with the Snap Pour Point and Watershed tools. Could you please share the sample datasets that are causing this issue and I can investigate further.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Snap Pour Point tool,&lt;BR /&gt;1) Input pour point (Raster or feature)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input accumulation raster (Raster)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Snap distance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Pour point field&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Watershed tool,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Input flow direction raster&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input pour point data (Is this the output from the Snap Pour Point tool? If so, you don't need to provide this)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Pour point field&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using &lt;STRONG&gt;any environment settings?&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Such as &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/environment-settings/parallel-processing-factor.htm"&gt;Parallel Processing Factor&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, could you also provide any information on the machine configuration you are using? &lt;BR /&gt;OS Name:&lt;BR /&gt;Processor:&lt;BR /&gt;Memory (RAM):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk space and type (SSD or HDD):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best Regards,&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;Neeraj Rajasekar | Spatial Analyst Product Engineer&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 19:14:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61442#M854</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-02T19:14:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Watershed tools very slow in ArcMap 10.7.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61443#M855</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Neeraj,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The sample data can be downloaded here: &lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nv3QceQI3gNnzkjPcizRsFE_6YzLtcmz/view?usp=sharing" title="https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Nv3QceQI3gNnzkjPcizRsFE_6YzLtcmz/view?usp=sharing"&gt;watershed_data.gdb.zip - Google Drive&lt;/A&gt; - the GDB includes the input raster for the pour point tool, the flow accumulation raster and the flow direction raster. To answer your questions,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For snap pour point tool:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Input pour point (Raster or feature) - included in GDB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input accumulation raster (Raster) - included in GDB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Snap distance - 0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;4) Pour point field - Value&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For Watershed tool,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1) Input flow direction raster - included in GDB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2) Input pour point data (Is this the output from the Snap Pour Point tool? If so, you don't need to provide this) - output from snap pour point tool&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3) Pour point field - Value&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you using &lt;STRONG&gt;any environment settings?&lt;/STRONG&gt; (Such as &lt;A class="" href="https://community.esri.com/external-link.jspa?url=https%3A%2F%2Fpro.arcgis.com%2Fen%2Fpro-app%2Ftool-reference%2Fenvironment-settings%2Fparallel-processing-factor.htm" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;Parallel Processing Factor&lt;/A&gt;)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I originally had no environment settings other than default. But, in testing, I tried increasing the parallel processing factor and it had no impact on the speed of the tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Lastly, could you also provide any information on the machine configuration you are using? &lt;BR /&gt;OS Name: Windows 10 Pro&lt;BR /&gt;Processor: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1245 v5 @3.50GHz&lt;BR /&gt;Memory (RAM): 16.0 GB&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Disk space and type (SSD or HDD): HDD 224 GB total, 45.2 GB free space&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I also made the switch to Windows 10 around the same time I upgraded to ArcMap 10.7, but I'm not sure if I ran these tools between the switch or not.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for checking this out!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 Jan 2020 13:42:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61443#M855</guid>
      <dc:creator>MollyMoore</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-03T13:42:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Watershed tools very slow in ArcMap 10.7.1</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61444#M856</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Molly,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried the Snap Pour Point and Watershed tools with your data. I'm unable to reproduce the performance issues you are encountering. For me these tools complete processing in&lt;STRONG&gt; 3.6 seconds for Snap Pour Point&lt;/STRONG&gt; and &lt;STRONG&gt;9.5 seconds for Watershed&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Snap Pour Point" class="jive-emoji image-1 jive-image" height="279" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/477382_snapPourPoint.jpg" width="357" /&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Watershed" class="jive-emoji image-2 jive-image" height="335" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/477425_Watershed.jpg" width="378" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The machine I tested on isn't that different to what you have (I have 32 GB RAM and a bit more SSD disk space), but that shouldn't result in such a vast difference, especially since the dataset isn't very big.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Is there any other information you could share about your run?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- What output format was used? (I tried TIFF and FGDB and both result in similar time).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Are you running through a python script? Does it take the same time through the application?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- Could you pleas confirm the software version used. Are you using ArcMAP 10.7.1 or 10.7?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;BR /&gt;Neeraj&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 04 Jan 2020 02:04:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/watershed-tools-very-slow-in-arcmap-10-7-1/m-p/61444#M856</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-01-04T02:04:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

