<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Creating cumulative areas from pixel values? in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/creating-cumulative-areas-from-pixel-values/m-p/574051#M8329</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have created a probability raster for the appearance of certain features, but want to turn this into a useful decision support tool. The thought is to have bounding boxes which enclose enough probability values to meet a threshold, such that it would require a much larger area to reach a 75% probability of find a feature when bounding low-probability pixels and a much smaller area to do so when bounding high-probability pixels. We have been experimenting with the Neighborhood tools in Spatial Analyst and wonder if there is a way to process these in reverse - instead of specifying a neighborhood area and generating statistics, to have the statistics dictate the size of the neighborhood. If anyone has any insight into this it would be much appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doug&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DougComer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-08-30T16:43:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Creating cumulative areas from pixel values?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/creating-cumulative-areas-from-pixel-values/m-p/574051#M8329</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have created a probability raster for the appearance of certain features, but want to turn this into a useful decision support tool. The thought is to have bounding boxes which enclose enough probability values to meet a threshold, such that it would require a much larger area to reach a 75% probability of find a feature when bounding low-probability pixels and a much smaller area to do so when bounding high-probability pixels. We have been experimenting with the Neighborhood tools in Spatial Analyst and wonder if there is a way to process these in reverse - instead of specifying a neighborhood area and generating statistics, to have the statistics dictate the size of the neighborhood. If anyone has any insight into this it would be much appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Doug&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:43:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/creating-cumulative-areas-from-pixel-values/m-p/574051#M8329</guid>
      <dc:creator>DougComer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-08-30T16:43:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

