<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is anyone using Cost Path surfaces for examining potential foot traffic routes in rural and wildland areas? in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-anyone-using-cost-path-surfaces-for-examining/m-p/571089#M8269</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;UPDATE - We tested this tool and it is awesome. The GIS shop here was impressed with its utility in testing walk-ability scenarios. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Ross_PaulMartin</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-12-08T19:09:16Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is anyone using Cost Path surfaces for examining potential foot traffic routes in rural and wildland areas?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-anyone-using-cost-path-surfaces-for-examining/m-p/571088#M8268</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am aware of this work and was wondering who was using it.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P style="min-height: 8pt; padding: 0px;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="https://science.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor/meetings/GWS_2011/docs/TTCSM_sherrill.pptx" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;https://science.nature.nps.gov/im/monitor/meetings/GWS_2011/docs/TTCSM_sherrill.pptx&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Oct 2014 22:26:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-anyone-using-cost-path-surfaces-for-examining/m-p/571088#M8268</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ross_PaulMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-10-17T22:26:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is anyone using Cost Path surfaces for examining potential foot traffic routes in rural and wildland areas?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-anyone-using-cost-path-surfaces-for-examining/m-p/571089#M8269</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;UPDATE - We tested this tool and it is awesome. The GIS shop here was impressed with its utility in testing walk-ability scenarios. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Dec 2014 19:09:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-anyone-using-cost-path-surfaces-for-examining/m-p/571089#M8269</guid>
      <dc:creator>Ross_PaulMartin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-12-08T19:09:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

