<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552756#M7954</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a problem . I am trying to perform viewshed analysis with GCS elevation data. My elevation data includes all world. The elevation values are all in meters. And I have observers shapefile with the same coordinate system of elevation layer. But I want to restrict the area in which the viewshed will be performed. In observers attribute&amp;nbsp; table I added the fields RADIUS1 and RADIUS2 but I don't know exactly what value of RADIUS2 can be given. Because the coordinate system is in lat and lon . Whatever I give, always the result layer includes only 0s (NOT VISIBLE). But when I clip the elevation data and I omit the RADIUS fields, the result layer is OK. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Must linear unit take place in elevation data?If so this means that the elevation data must be in Projected Coordinate System when working with RADIUS values.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you please help me.Am I doing something wrong? Is there anything I must take into consideration?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>TubaKumbara</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-04-21T19:56:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552756#M7954</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a problem . I am trying to perform viewshed analysis with GCS elevation data. My elevation data includes all world. The elevation values are all in meters. And I have observers shapefile with the same coordinate system of elevation layer. But I want to restrict the area in which the viewshed will be performed. In observers attribute&amp;nbsp; table I added the fields RADIUS1 and RADIUS2 but I don't know exactly what value of RADIUS2 can be given. Because the coordinate system is in lat and lon . Whatever I give, always the result layer includes only 0s (NOT VISIBLE). But when I clip the elevation data and I omit the RADIUS fields, the result layer is OK. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Must linear unit take place in elevation data?If so this means that the elevation data must be in Projected Coordinate System when working with RADIUS values.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Could you please help me.Am I doing something wrong? Is there anything I must take into consideration?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 19:56:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552756#M7954</guid>
      <dc:creator>TubaKumbara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-21T19:56:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552757#M7955</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;By default, the limiting distances RADIUS1 and RADIUS2 are interpreted as three-dimensional line-of-sight distances. To ensure that the slope distance is calculated correctly, both the ground units and surface ZUNITS must be in the same unit of measure.&amp;nbsp; Your Z units differ from your ground units.&amp;nbsp; Sometimes this is manageable with the z factor parameter, but your data is for the whole world so one z factor is not suitable at that scale.&amp;nbsp; To obtain optimal results I recommend using an equidistant projection.&amp;nbsp; Something like World Azimuthal Equidistant should do just fine.&amp;nbsp; Project your points as well.&amp;nbsp; The distance you specify in RADIUS 2 will have the units of the projection of the points.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 18:35:52 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552757#M7955</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricRice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-23T18:35:52Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552758#M7956</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I tried to project my all data to perform viewshed analysis. But I couldn't decide which projection exactly to use.There is no projection named World Azimuthal Equidistant. Instead there are North/South Pole Azimuthal Equidistant and World Equidistant Cylindrical/Conic. Which do you think&amp;nbsp; gives best results? I tried Equidistant Cylindrical projection but the result elevation data doesn't show the elevation values in ArcGlobe. May the elevation data in the layer be lost?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 10:07:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552758#M7956</guid>
      <dc:creator>TubaKumbara</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-04-26T10:07:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552759#M7957</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;World Equidistant Cylindrical/Conic should be just fine.&amp;nbsp; The message here is that you want an equidistant projection.&amp;nbsp; Since your data is global you should avoid the polor projections.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 20:36:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552759#M7957</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricRice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-05-03T20:36:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed with elevation of Geographic Coordinate System</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552760#M7958</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm having exactly the same problem. When I leave out RADIUS2, the viewshed calculated with no problems. When I include it, I get a viewshed entirely comprised of zero values.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Was this problem ever resolved?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Rach.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 28 Apr 2011 11:55:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-with-elevation-of-geographic-coordinate/m-p/552760#M7958</guid>
      <dc:creator>RachaelHickling</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-04-28T11:55:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

