<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Is there any statistical measure comparing different sets of location configurations? in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4401#M73</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if that will provide a definite measure for comparing how close the optimized network is to the existing one. There are several different optimized configurations obtained through utilizing different optimization criteria and the intent here is to quantitatively assess which optimization criterion would provide a solution that is most similar to the existing network... will the point density estimation do the job in this case?? Thanks for your answer though...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Tae-Jung_JonathanKwon</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-02-10T00:12:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Is there any statistical measure comparing different sets of location configurations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4399#M71</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My question may seem confusing but here is what I'd want to do;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have a given set of facility locations as shown below, ;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Existing.PNG" class="jive-image image-1" height="350" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/59468_Existing.PNG" style="width: 314px; height: 350.338278931751px;" width="314" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And based on a predefined optimization criterion, I optimized the whole network and obtained the following configuration;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="optimized.PNG" class="jive-image image-2" height="326" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/59469_optimized.PNG" style="height: 326px; width: 292.221686746988px;" width="292" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand that whatever the optimization criterion I used, I can simply look at the criterion value for both and say that the optimized network is "better". &lt;STRONG&gt;But I am need of another statistical measure&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;STRONG&gt;that will tell how similar or different the new network (i.e., 2nd figure) is when compared to the existing network (i.e., 1st figure)&lt;/STRONG&gt;. Below is the figure showing both configurations;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="combined.PNG" class="jive-image image-3" height="340" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/59470_combined.PNG" style="height: 340px; width: 297.095238095238px;" width="297" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not so sure if that performance or benchmarking measure is available to quantitatively describe how similar/different the optimized network is to the existing one, but it will be useful when I have different sets of optimization results using different criteria and see which criterion would give the solution that best matches the existing one.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any comments or thoughts are greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2015 20:00:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4399#M71</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tae-Jung_JonathanKwon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-06T20:00:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any statistical measure comparing different sets of location configurations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4400#M72</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you compare statewide point density variance? It looks like the main difference is that point density is more variable (more clumps and voids) in the optimized surface than the more even original surface. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2015 05:11:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4400#M72</guid>
      <dc:creator>DarrenWiens2</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-09T05:11:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is there any statistical measure comparing different sets of location configurations?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4401#M73</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am not sure if that will provide a definite measure for comparing how close the optimized network is to the existing one. There are several different optimized configurations obtained through utilizing different optimization criteria and the intent here is to quantitatively assess which optimization criterion would provide a solution that is most similar to the existing network... will the point density estimation do the job in this case?? Thanks for your answer though...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2015 00:12:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/is-there-any-statistical-measure-comparing/m-p/4401#M73</guid>
      <dc:creator>Tae-Jung_JonathanKwon</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-02-10T00:12:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

