<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: How to find the best kernel size statistically (in Focal statistics) in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459623#M6623</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That will vary with the input raster, the nature of the kernel and other factors...All I can tell you with any certainty as the kernel size increases, any value being calculated approaches that of the overall value for the raster as a whole.&amp;nbsp; As an example, you can verify this by setting kernel size so that it equal raster size and calculating the mean.&amp;nbsp; As you decrease kernel size, you begin...potentially... to introduce variation in the calculated values and they may become more diverse until each cell is unique at that location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-12-09T16:01:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>How to find the best kernel size statistically (in Focal statistics)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459620#M6620</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would like to find an appropriate kernel size for evaluation of mean for my raster DEM in &lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/EN/HELP/MAIN/10.1/index.html#//009z000000qs000000"&gt;Focal Statistics&lt;/A&gt;. Is there a way to select the best kernel size statistically without looking into the data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459620#M6620</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarolinaKorzeniowska</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T14:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to find the best kernel size statistically (in Focal statistics)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459621#M6621</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short... No ... It is not only the size of the kernel, but its shape. If you happen to be analysing a raster with a directional pattern, then you would want to use one whose shape best reflects the directionality.&amp;nbsp; Focal statistics are often used to analyse the nature of the raster by varying the size and shape of the kernel&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/desktop/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/focal-statistics.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/desktop/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/focal-statistics.htm"&gt;Focal Statistics—Help | ArcGIS for Desktop&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;other options entail converting your raster to numpy arrays and use numpy or scipy to look for other patterns&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 14:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459621#M6621</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T14:17:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to find the best kernel size statistically (in Focal statistics)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459622#M6622</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer. I thought that it might be possible to find a kernel size (as a threshold) which tells me that e.g. smoothing above this kernel size will not change the the results significantly more than smoothing using this kernel.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 15:01:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459622#M6622</guid>
      <dc:creator>KarolinaKorzeniowska</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T15:01:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: How to find the best kernel size statistically (in Focal statistics)</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459623#M6623</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;That will vary with the input raster, the nature of the kernel and other factors...All I can tell you with any certainty as the kernel size increases, any value being calculated approaches that of the overall value for the raster as a whole.&amp;nbsp; As an example, you can verify this by setting kernel size so that it equal raster size and calculating the mean.&amp;nbsp; As you decrease kernel size, you begin...potentially... to introduce variation in the calculated values and they may become more diverse until each cell is unique at that location&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2015 16:01:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/how-to-find-the-best-kernel-size-statistically-in/m-p/459623#M6623</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-12-09T16:01:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

