<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Spatial Analyst Point vs. Kernel Density in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-point-vs-kernel-density/m-p/413542#M5798</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am working on a project to understand point density to create delivery areas. I have a national database of delivery points (addresses) I then use Spatial Analyst to use the selected delivery points to create a raster. (using all of the defaults, output cell size, neighbourhood etc)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My problem is that i am getting inconsistent results if I do a city view vs. a suburb view I get a different result. The city view shows the area in question to be more dense. I am guessing that it is operator error but I am unable to work it out. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there a way that I can get a consistent view at a city level as well as a suburb level, would I be better off with Kernel Density?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any ideas greatly appreciated &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jamie&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamieTill</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-09-17T02:44:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spatial Analyst Point vs. Kernel Density</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-point-vs-kernel-density/m-p/413542#M5798</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi there,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am working on a project to understand point density to create delivery areas. I have a national database of delivery points (addresses) I then use Spatial Analyst to use the selected delivery points to create a raster. (using all of the defaults, output cell size, neighbourhood etc)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My problem is that i am getting inconsistent results if I do a city view vs. a suburb view I get a different result. The city view shows the area in question to be more dense. I am guessing that it is operator error but I am unable to work it out. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Is there a way that I can get a consistent view at a city level as well as a suburb level, would I be better off with Kernel Density?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any ideas greatly appreciated &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Regards&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jamie&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Sep 2010 02:44:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-point-vs-kernel-density/m-p/413542#M5798</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamieTill</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-09-17T02:44:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

