<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Failed DEM from LiDAR in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/failed-dem-from-lidar/m-p/297639#M4200</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a DEM using a multipoint file that was derived from a .LAS file. The DEM did not use a large portion of the points and does not encompass the entirety of the study area. Several million points were excluded when creating the DEM using IDW. I ran the IDW a second time and, while the second DEM included more of the points, there was still a large amount of points excluded. For reference, I set the cell size to 1cm using the closest 100 points so there should be plenty of information to generate a larger DEM including the excluded points. Has anyone run into this problem before using .LAS data or know of any way to fix this issue? The only thing I can think of is to set the extent to a boundary that covers all the points. I am worried this will that this will still exclude&amp;nbsp;some of the points&amp;nbsp;and the DEM will just be a shadow beyond what has already been created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MatthewNolasco</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-03-25T16:05:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Failed DEM from LiDAR</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/failed-dem-from-lidar/m-p/297639#M4200</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I created a DEM using a multipoint file that was derived from a .LAS file. The DEM did not use a large portion of the points and does not encompass the entirety of the study area. Several million points were excluded when creating the DEM using IDW. I ran the IDW a second time and, while the second DEM included more of the points, there was still a large amount of points excluded. For reference, I set the cell size to 1cm using the closest 100 points so there should be plenty of information to generate a larger DEM including the excluded points. Has anyone run into this problem before using .LAS data or know of any way to fix this issue? The only thing I can think of is to set the extent to a boundary that covers all the points. I am worried this will that this will still exclude&amp;nbsp;some of the points&amp;nbsp;and the DEM will just be a shadow beyond what has already been created.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Mar 2019 16:05:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/failed-dem-from-lidar/m-p/297639#M4200</guid>
      <dc:creator>MatthewNolasco</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-25T16:05:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Failed DEM from LiDAR</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/failed-dem-from-lidar/m-p/297640#M4201</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;moving to &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/space/2091"&gt;Spatial Analyst&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 27 Mar 2019 01:27:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/failed-dem-from-lidar/m-p/297640#M4201</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-03-27T01:27:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

