<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Spatial Analyst -- Viewshed Problems in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-viewshed-problems/m-p/31898#M415</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello, this is my first post on these forums (they have been very, very helpful so far).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Posted this on the Geoprocessing forum as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need to get viewsheds for multiple tower locations in an area, so that our Field Wireless team can decide where is the best place to put a tower in order to get the best coverage.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We would like to automate this process, so the Field Wireless guys can run this on their own (without being GIS savvy) and so a GIS Support member doesn't have to stop his/her work to create one of these for the FW people (very time consuming, labor intensive, etc.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. So I am in the process of building a Viewshed model/script that will take an input .csv file from the user (with a list of tower names, latitude, longitude, OFFSETA (tower height), OFFSETB (receiver height), RADIUS1 (minimum radius), RADIUS2 (maximum radius)). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Then it will turn that .csv into a shapefile containing all the locations. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Then it will break apart that shapefile into a seperate .shp for each location. (I used Dan Patterson's shapefile break Python code for this) THANKS!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. Then loop through each new .shp and run viewshed analysis on it. Then to account for trees I MINUS the areas with tree cover from the viewshed output to get the final result. (I repeat this process for all locations inputed)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This model works fine, but I am now getting odd results when running Viewshed Analysis through the model or through the tool in ArcMap. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I get an expected result when using my original .shp files from a few weeks ago.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When using the .shp that I create in the model though, I get for some locations a result that is way off. For some locations it is much better, but still is not the exact same as when using the old shapefiles. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am baffled by this because when examining the attribute tables of both, they are identical.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone think that they can help me?? I am really struggling with what the problem could be.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry about being so lengthy, but if anyone has any ideas about the problem I would really appreciate some help. (I am working in 9.3 by the way)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>CharlieRoberts</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2010-07-13T11:55:28Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spatial Analyst -- Viewshed Problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-viewshed-problems/m-p/31898#M415</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hello, this is my first post on these forums (they have been very, very helpful so far).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Posted this on the Geoprocessing forum as well.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I need to get viewsheds for multiple tower locations in an area, so that our Field Wireless team can decide where is the best place to put a tower in order to get the best coverage.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We would like to automate this process, so the Field Wireless guys can run this on their own (without being GIS savvy) and so a GIS Support member doesn't have to stop his/her work to create one of these for the FW people (very time consuming, labor intensive, etc.)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. So I am in the process of building a Viewshed model/script that will take an input .csv file from the user (with a list of tower names, latitude, longitude, OFFSETA (tower height), OFFSETB (receiver height), RADIUS1 (minimum radius), RADIUS2 (maximum radius)). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Then it will turn that .csv into a shapefile containing all the locations. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Then it will break apart that shapefile into a seperate .shp for each location. (I used Dan Patterson's shapefile break Python code for this) THANKS!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. Then loop through each new .shp and run viewshed analysis on it. Then to account for trees I MINUS the areas with tree cover from the viewshed output to get the final result. (I repeat this process for all locations inputed)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This model works fine, but I am now getting odd results when running Viewshed Analysis through the model or through the tool in ArcMap. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I get an expected result when using my original .shp files from a few weeks ago.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When using the .shp that I create in the model though, I get for some locations a result that is way off. For some locations it is much better, but still is not the exact same as when using the old shapefiles. &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am baffled by this because when examining the attribute tables of both, they are identical.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone think that they can help me?? I am really struggling with what the problem could be.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Sorry about being so lengthy, but if anyone has any ideas about the problem I would really appreciate some help. (I am working in 9.3 by the way)&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Jul 2010 11:55:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-viewshed-problems/m-p/31898#M415</guid>
      <dc:creator>CharlieRoberts</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2010-07-13T11:55:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

