<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Euclidean Distance Too Grouping Features in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294002#M4148</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3116"&gt;Dan Patterson&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;you should be using a projected coordinate space to do this analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are you trying to achieve? Judging from the picture, the cell size is much larger than the density of the points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the scale of the colour ramped raster looks strange.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/euclidean-distance.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/euclidean-distance.htm"&gt;Euclidean Distance—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/point-density.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/point-density.htm"&gt;Point Density—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not be more suitable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>NeilAyres</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-04-12T07:57:17Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Euclidean Distance Tool Grouping Features</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294000#M4146</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am trying to perform a spatial analysis of communication towers in the United States for an intro level GIS class, and I have run into trouble with the Euclidean Distance tool grouping my feature points together. Any help would be appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 21:36:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294000#M4146</guid>
      <dc:creator>BradyFehlhafer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-11T21:36:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Euclidean Distance Too Grouping Features</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294001#M4147</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;you should be using projected point data (perhaps an Albers used in the U.S.) and you need to specify the extent to something bounding the input points.&amp;nbsp; What cell size are you using?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2017 23:30:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294001#M4147</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-11T23:30:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Euclidean Distance Too Grouping Features</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294002#M4148</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I agree with&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/migrated-users/3116"&gt;Dan Patterson&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;you should be using a projected coordinate space to do this analysis.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What are you trying to achieve? Judging from the picture, the cell size is much larger than the density of the points.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;And the scale of the colour ramped raster looks strange.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/euclidean-distance.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/euclidean-distance.htm"&gt;Euclidean Distance—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Would this&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/point-density.htm" title="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/tools/spatial-analyst-toolbox/point-density.htm"&gt;Point Density—Help | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;not be more suitable?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2017 07:57:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/euclidean-distance-tool-grouping-features/m-p/294002#M4148</guid>
      <dc:creator>NeilAyres</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-04-12T07:57:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

