<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Zonal Statistics results are not equal in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257727#M3674</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I???m trying to get a value for mean water runoff by wilderness area. I am using the Zonal Statistics as Table tool with wilderness areas as the input raster and water runoff as the input value raster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Problem:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Zonal stats produces higher values for total runoff and area when combining wilderness with owners and regions compared to wilderness with just owners.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Procedure:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Set environment - projection, extent, cell size (100 meters), and 100-meter snap raster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. I start with two versions of wilderness by federal agency polygon shapefiles: one divided by Forest Service regions and one that isn???t.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Then I use the Feature to Raster tool for converting the two wilderness shapefiles to rasters.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. Project and resample the runoff grid from 5 km to 100 meters so that it matches the wilderness rasters.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Zonal Statistics as Table Results:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Total wilderness area is greater for wilderness by agency and region compared to wilderness by agency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Total runoff is greater for each wilderness when split by agency and region compared to wilderness by agency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone have any idea why I am getting these different results?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pam&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PamFroemke</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-05-27T16:48:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Zonal Statistics results are not equal</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257727#M3674</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I???m trying to get a value for mean water runoff by wilderness area. I am using the Zonal Statistics as Table tool with wilderness areas as the input raster and water runoff as the input value raster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Problem:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Zonal stats produces higher values for total runoff and area when combining wilderness with owners and regions compared to wilderness with just owners.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Procedure:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Set environment - projection, extent, cell size (100 meters), and 100-meter snap raster.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. I start with two versions of wilderness by federal agency polygon shapefiles: one divided by Forest Service regions and one that isn???t.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;3. Then I use the Feature to Raster tool for converting the two wilderness shapefiles to rasters.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;4. Project and resample the runoff grid from 5 km to 100 meters so that it matches the wilderness rasters.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Zonal Statistics as Table Results:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;1. Total wilderness area is greater for wilderness by agency and region compared to wilderness by agency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;2. Total runoff is greater for each wilderness when split by agency and region compared to wilderness by agency.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Does anyone have any idea why I am getting these different results?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pam&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 May 2011 16:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257727#M3674</guid>
      <dc:creator>PamFroemke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-27T16:48:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zonal Statistics results are not equal</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257728#M3675</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Does anyone have any idea why I am getting these different results?&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pam, just an approach to try:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I would compare the two input zone rasters (wilderness, wilderness x regions) to make sure the cell sizes, extents, cell counts match up the way you think they are matching up BEFORE you run the zonal statistics.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Then before I ran the zonal stats I'd make sure the GP environment is set the same for both runs.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 12:41:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257728#M3675</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-05-30T12:41:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Zonal Statistics results are not equal</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257729#M3676</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Curt,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I compared my two input datasets and found that the extents were slightly different. They were also different than the extent I defined before I ran the model. Is there another setting that over-rides the model's environment settings?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for the help,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Pam&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jun 2011 19:11:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/zonal-statistics-results-are-not-equal/m-p/257729#M3676</guid>
      <dc:creator>PamFroemke</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-06-14T19:11:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

