<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Weighted Overlay with one value in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-with-one-value/m-p/15265#M258</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently doing a project and I am not sure whether using weights in raster calculator or using the weighted overlay tool is the best option.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My situation is this: I am proposing site suitability for a business localised within a region. Within this region, there are several small areas. Broadband access varies across the region - some small areas with &amp;gt;12Mb others &amp;gt;25MB. These small areas with the respective 12 or 25mb broadband have been normalised in a raster (1,0). There is one small area in the region with access to 25MB and several smaller areas littered around the region with access to 12MB. Essentially, when I proposing my site, I want the 25MB small area favoured over the 12MB areas - in other words, the closer to the 25MB area the better. (Within this project, I have many other criteria for the site so it might not exactly fall within the 25MB area. That's why I want it the closer the better). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If anyone could be any help, it would be immensely appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>AnthonyFlynn</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-01-14T09:40:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weighted Overlay with one value</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-with-one-value/m-p/15265#M258</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I am currently doing a project and I am not sure whether using weights in raster calculator or using the weighted overlay tool is the best option.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My situation is this: I am proposing site suitability for a business localised within a region. Within this region, there are several small areas. Broadband access varies across the region - some small areas with &amp;gt;12Mb others &amp;gt;25MB. These small areas with the respective 12 or 25mb broadband have been normalised in a raster (1,0). There is one small area in the region with access to 25MB and several smaller areas littered around the region with access to 12MB. Essentially, when I proposing my site, I want the 25MB small area favoured over the 12MB areas - in other words, the closer to the 25MB area the better. (Within this project, I have many other criteria for the site so it might not exactly fall within the 25MB area. That's why I want it the closer the better). &lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;If anyone could be any help, it would be immensely appreciated.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2014 09:40:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-with-one-value/m-p/15265#M258</guid>
      <dc:creator>AnthonyFlynn</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-01-14T09:40:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

