<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Weighted Overlay Extent  in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-extent/m-p/149649#M2092</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the first stage of a suitability analysis for subsurface soil/groundwater. I am trying to combine two raster datasets one being a smaller extent raster of clay soil depth and one way larger groundwater depth raster. I want the two to combine with equal influence to create a raster extent that includes the clay raster layer values combined with ground water but keeps the values of the larger ground water layer that don't intersect the clay layer's extent for later stages of the suitability analysis, but I want the extent to be of the larger raster dataset and not limited to just what is within the smaller extent clay raster. I keep running the model and I continue to get the smaller extent combination regardless if I change the environmental settings of the extent to be the larger extent or union of the two inputs. Is the weigted overlay tool limited to certain processing extents? Or should I be using a different spatial analysis approach for these two rasters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MatthewTwietmeyer</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-05T21:10:44Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Weighted Overlay Extent</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-extent/m-p/149649#M2092</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am in the first stage of a suitability analysis for subsurface soil/groundwater. I am trying to combine two raster datasets one being a smaller extent raster of clay soil depth and one way larger groundwater depth raster. I want the two to combine with equal influence to create a raster extent that includes the clay raster layer values combined with ground water but keeps the values of the larger ground water layer that don't intersect the clay layer's extent for later stages of the suitability analysis, but I want the extent to be of the larger raster dataset and not limited to just what is within the smaller extent clay raster. I keep running the model and I continue to get the smaller extent combination regardless if I change the environmental settings of the extent to be the larger extent or union of the two inputs. Is the weigted overlay tool limited to certain processing extents? Or should I be using a different spatial analysis approach for these two rasters?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Matt&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2015 21:10:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-extent/m-p/149649#M2092</guid>
      <dc:creator>MatthewTwietmeyer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-05T21:10:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Weighted Overlay Extent</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-extent/m-p/149650#M2093</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This isn't about processing extent. If you go into the ArcMap layer symbology and symbolize your NoData with a color symbol, you'll see that your grids are coming out full extent, but your result cells are NoData if any of the input cells at that location are NoData.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;For most operators, including Weighted Overlay, if any of the inputs are NoData, the output for that cell is NoData.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The solution is to use Raster Calculator to reclassify your NoData cells to something that will carry through your analysis, for example, zero.&amp;nbsp; You can do this after you run your weighted overlay too.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The following Raster Calculator expression will replace all NoData cells with zero over the current extent (by default, Union of Inputs = the extent of "in_raster"):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;PRE __default_attr="python" __jive_macro_name="code" class="jive_macro_code _jivemacro_uid_14449630428925905 jive_text_macro" data-renderedposition="239_8_912_16" jivemacro_uid="_14449630428925905"&gt;&lt;P&gt;Con(IsNull("in_raster"), 0, "in_raster")&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/PRE&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hope this helps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2015 02:40:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/weighted-overlay-extent/m-p/149650#M2093</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-16T02:40:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

