<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Problem with the output from Line Density Tool in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384230#M12127</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! I am working on my master thesis and want to analyze the density of the bicycle network of a relatively big town in Germany (ca. 380.000 people). I use data from OSM that I extracted with Overpass Turbo. The angular unit of the file was automatically in degree because of the GCS so I converted everything to a suitable PCS with meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the problem: I tested a lot with the line density tool to create an index like the papers my work is based on did. I chose an output cell size of 100 (to get 100x100m) and a search radius of 250 (that is based on the papers). As Area units I picked square map units and also chose the correct Output Coordinate System in the Environments part of the tool.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results that I get from that are confusing to me. They range from 0,001 to 0,024. In my understanding that should be meters/squaremeters which is obviously way too low for a dense urban area. I tested a lot of different things but I just don't get what is going wrong here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mentioned papers say they used Math tools to make the values easier to interpretate but I don't know what they mean by that. Meters/Squaremeters should be the output and that is perfectly interpretable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope someone can save me here, because I am really lost.. Thank you very much in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ole&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>OleKoppert</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-02-20T08:44:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Problem with the output from Line Density Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384230#M12127</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello! I am working on my master thesis and want to analyze the density of the bicycle network of a relatively big town in Germany (ca. 380.000 people). I use data from OSM that I extracted with Overpass Turbo. The angular unit of the file was automatically in degree because of the GCS so I converted everything to a suitable PCS with meters.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now the problem: I tested a lot with the line density tool to create an index like the papers my work is based on did. I chose an output cell size of 100 (to get 100x100m) and a search radius of 250 (that is based on the papers). As Area units I picked square map units and also chose the correct Output Coordinate System in the Environments part of the tool.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The results that I get from that are confusing to me. They range from 0,001 to 0,024. In my understanding that should be meters/squaremeters which is obviously way too low for a dense urban area. I tested a lot of different things but I just don't get what is going wrong here.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The mentioned papers say they used Math tools to make the values easier to interpretate but I don't know what they mean by that. Meters/Squaremeters should be the output and that is perfectly interpretable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I hope someone can save me here, because I am really lost.. Thank you very much in advance!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ole&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 08:44:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384230#M12127</guid>
      <dc:creator>OleKoppert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-20T08:44:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with the output from Line Density Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384258#M12128</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Did you read the following to help you interpret your results&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/spatial-analyst/how-line-density-works.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;How Line Density works—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Also, if your data were initially in decimal degrees, you need to produce a new raster in a suitable projected coordinate system&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/project-raster.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Project Raster (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;preferably one in the&amp;nbsp; equal area or conformal projection classes (eg UTM )&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 10:43:17 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384258#M12128</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-20T10:43:17Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Problem with the output from Line Density Tool</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384266#M12129</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for your response!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Yes I did read how the line densitiy tool works. Also the tool automatically transforms the Feature Class to a Raster doesn't it? That is why I picked the suitable PCS (UTM 32) in the Line Density Tool. I just tried to convert it with the tool you mentioned and it changed nothing. I think because the Line Density Tool already did that.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think the problem is either that I just don't understand the results (because I think 0,024 Meters per m² is very low) or that that my data is not in the correct format. But as I said I just pulled my data into ArcGIS, transformed it with the "Project" Tool to UTM32 so that the units are in meter and then I performed the Line Density Tool, which should be the right way shouldn't it? I should maybe mention that the visualization of density is perfectly fine, so it seems to work but I cannot work with that when I don't have values to interpretate.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2024 11:05:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/problem-with-the-output-from-line-density-tool/m-p/1384266#M12129</guid>
      <dc:creator>OleKoppert</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-20T11:05:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

