<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Gaps in watershed after watershed delineation in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1340864#M12012</link>
    <description>Sorry, I don't. I'm hoping an expert in this area will help us all out.&lt;BR /&gt;Kathy&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kathy71jones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-10-24T12:51:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Gaps in watershed after watershed delineation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1338145#M12003</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've been doing a watershed delineation in ArcGIS Pro 3.1.4 from a 50cm DEM. I've done this according to the following workflow: DEM fill, Flow direction (D8), Flow accumulation (D8), placing outlet points and running the watershed tool. Unfortunately, the watersheds that the tool is outputting leaves a couple of gaps where there is no watershed data (and where there is data in the DEM). I can't link an image, but basically it looks like a group of coloured shapes together, where one chunk is missing and you can see whatever's underneath the layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas why this could be and how to deal with it?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Oct 2023 10:53:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1338145#M12003</guid>
      <dc:creator>HMort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-16T10:53:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gaps in watershed after watershed delineation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1340864#M12012</link>
      <description>Sorry, I don't. I'm hoping an expert in this area will help us all out.&lt;BR /&gt;Kathy&lt;BR /&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2023 12:51:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1340864#M12012</guid>
      <dc:creator>kathy71jones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-10-24T12:51:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Gaps in watershed after watershed delineation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1507855#M12222</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To update this, I basically found that the resolution was too high. This was too computationally expensive for the system I was using to run, causing a lot of noise and the aforementioned gaps.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:03:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/gaps-in-watershed-after-watershed-delineation/m-p/1507855#M12222</guid>
      <dc:creator>HMort</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-22T11:03:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

