<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Kernel density on the edge in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/kernel-density-on-the-edge/m-p/1158850#M11644</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;it could be treated as a separate tree population depending on how the disease is spread or the time needed to spread&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-29T14:08:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Kernel density on the edge</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/kernel-density-on-the-edge/m-p/1158845#M11643</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So I have a few&amp;nbsp;thousands trees. Some of them have&amp;nbsp;disease (just an example).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Assuming something in the area cause it I would like to know what is the chance to have the&amp;nbsp;disease in a new tree location.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I do a kernel density on the trees. Then on just the trees with the&amp;nbsp;disease&amp;nbsp; and divide them to get the results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This works nice for areas that have many trees.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If I have a big gaps between group of trees I see a problem in these gaps.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The values in the kernel of the sick trees go from 2 to 1 (again, just an example) but the kernel for trees go from 10 to 3 so the value of the result change from 0.2 to 0.33 - it does not look right.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am thinking about just clip all the value below 1 from the sick tree kernel out and have to results there.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Anybody have any idea about this problem?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 13:57:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/kernel-density-on-the-edge/m-p/1158845#M11643</guid>
      <dc:creator>mody_buchbinder</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-29T13:57:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Kernel density on the edge</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/kernel-density-on-the-edge/m-p/1158850#M11644</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;it could be treated as a separate tree population depending on how the disease is spread or the time needed to spread&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 29 Mar 2022 14:08:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/kernel-density-on-the-edge/m-p/1158850#M11644</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-29T14:08:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

