<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Species Distribution - What Analysis would work best? in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158173#M11631</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Was the sampling carried out in random sampling framework or some other approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The methodology of data collection can have a significant impact on any conjectures of data association with spatial location&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2022 09:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-27T09:19:03Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Species Distribution - What Analysis would work best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158073#M11630</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all. I am fairly new to GIS and Esri software (Been using it around just half a year!), so apologies if this is a noob post.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My semester project involves looking at macroinvertebrate counts at 186 points and seeing if there is a correlation between species diversity and distribution and land use. My hypothesis is that urban areas would have more species (particularly chironomids) due to nutrients inputs from urban areas.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I was going to do a hot spot analysis, but that moreso involves density rather than diversity. I am interested to see what species like urban areas and what don't. What kinds of methods would work best for these kinds of analyses?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 25 Mar 2022 22:11:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158073#M11630</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarlyConticchio1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-25T22:11:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Species Distribution - What Analysis would work best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158173#M11631</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Was the sampling carried out in random sampling framework or some other approach?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The methodology of data collection can have a significant impact on any conjectures of data association with spatial location&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2022 09:19:03 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158173#M11631</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-27T09:19:03Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Species Distribution - What Analysis would work best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158194#M11636</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello. I got my data from my state’s environmental protection agency, it is not my own. But from what I understand from the report, sites were chosen at random.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If &amp;nbsp;you mean the macro samples. They randomly sampled the location. &amp;nbsp; Then they counted the organisms until the reached 100 then IDs them. I knew that would be an issue for a density analysis. So I am just looking at a certain phylum on organisms rather than everything they collected.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2022 18:16:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158194#M11636</guid>
      <dc:creator>CarlyConticchio1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-27T18:16:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Species Distribution - What Analysis would work best?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158210#M11637</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;recent post&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/state-and-local-environment-and-natural-resources/maxgeeking-out-on-maxent-presence-only-species/m-p/1158206#M103" target="_blank"&gt;MaxGeeking Out On MaxEnt/Presence Only Species Mod... - Esri Community&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 27 Mar 2022 21:24:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/species-distribution-what-analysis-would-work-best/m-p/1158210#M11637</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-27T21:24:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

