<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Hot Spot Analysis with Partitioned or Data with Breaks in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759792#M10988</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a large data-set consisting of ±70K incidents. The scale is county-wide minus municipal limits (which creates breaks or holes through the data).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My question is: has anyone had this experience using the tool? If so, what is the approach? Should I partition or segment the analysis or is the tool intelligent enough to account for large areas without data?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any help,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>LarryGaudieri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-10-15T15:22:07Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hot Spot Analysis with Partitioned or Data with Breaks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759792#M10988</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have a large data-set consisting of ±70K incidents. The scale is county-wide minus municipal limits (which creates breaks or holes through the data).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;My question is: has anyone had this experience using the tool? If so, what is the approach? Should I partition or segment the analysis or is the tool intelligent enough to account for large areas without data?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks for any help,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Oct 2013 15:22:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759792#M10988</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryGaudieri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-15T15:22:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hot Spot Analysis with Partitioned or Data with Breaks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759793#M10989</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Hi Larry,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;The (optimized) Hot spot analysis does not account for large areas without data. It is not an interpolation, but a statistical analysis of the number of incidents. If there are no incidents, clustering will be low, which will not result in a hot spot.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Some reading:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//005p00000057000000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;How Optimized Hot Spot Analysis Works&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;A class="jive-link-external-small" href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//005p00000011000000" rel="nofollow" target="_blank"&gt;How Hot Spot Analysis (Getis-Ord Gi*) works&lt;/A&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Kind regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Xander&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 06:31:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759793#M10989</guid>
      <dc:creator>XanderBakker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-16T06:31:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hot Spot Analysis with Partitioned or Data with Breaks</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759794#M10990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks Xander,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Should have mentioned that I was still using 10.1&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I did some looking and experimented with the interpolation tools and they accommodate breaks and voids but I'm still trying to understand the pattern of the result. I'll keep poking it...&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks again&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:31:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/hot-spot-analysis-with-partitioned-or-data-with/m-p/759794#M10990</guid>
      <dc:creator>LarryGaudieri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-10-16T18:31:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

