<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738962#M10713</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer Dan. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Initially I thought about ascribing cost based on the slope. I think a way to do this would be to create each path at one time using the cost distance tool. Setting one point to be the origin (number 1 for ex.) and the following (number 2) to be the destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I understand each cell composing the path would have a value. As a consequence of this each path would have an acummulative value too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would then have 4 individual paths and at least 3 loops with different accumulative values&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-2-4-1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-3-4-2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3-4-1-3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I want to identify using a OD matrix is which of the loops demands less effort in order to be completed. (In terms of a hikker, which path is easier). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Juan_Poblete</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2014-08-20T10:26:31Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738960#M10711</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-family: arial, helvetica, 'helvetica neue', verdana, sans-serif;"&gt;Hi! I am kind of new to ArcGIS and I would appreciate some help. I need to create a network of footpaths joining multiple destinations and carry a cost / benefit analysis based on; landuse, slope and proximity to tourist attractions in order to identify suitable loops. The scenario is new footpaths within a natural state reserve)&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; The sketch attached is a simplification of the real problem and does not take into account the real number of points&amp;nbsp; (about 25) and the potential loops they can create (which I believe should rise up to 25!). In the sketch attached the result of the analysis should highlight which loop is preferable; 1-2-4-1 or 2-3-4-2.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I have thought on carrying a cost distance analysis for each par of points and then carry a OD cost matrix. Is there a better way todo this?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 09:50:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738960#M10711</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_Poblete</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T09:50:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738961#M10712</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Your problem has not been clarified &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/thread/106317?sr=stream&amp;amp;ru=46797"&gt;since your last post&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp; You will have to provide details as to how you are ascribing costs to the surface and to the paths themselves and where some sample origins and destinations are.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Aug 2014 10:19:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738961#M10712</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-13T10:19:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738962#M10713</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you for your answer Dan. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Initially I thought about ascribing cost based on the slope. I think a way to do this would be to create each path at one time using the cost distance tool. Setting one point to be the origin (number 1 for ex.) and the following (number 2) to be the destination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From what I understand each cell composing the path would have a value. As a consequence of this each path would have an acummulative value too. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I would then have 4 individual paths and at least 3 loops with different accumulative values&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1-2-4-1&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2-3-4-2&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;3-4-1-3&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I want to identify using a OD matrix is which of the loops demands less effort in order to be completed. (In terms of a hikker, which path is easier). &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 10:26:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738962#M10713</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_Poblete</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-20T10:26:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738963#M10714</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;From the image you include I think there are 4 different triangles that can be created, and you could change the start/end points for each triangle. There is a thing to keep in mind when doing a cost distance and a subsequent least cost path analysis including a weight based on the slope. In a slope map the cells hold the maximum slope of that cell in relation to its neighbors. You can however cross a cell in different ways (uphill, downhill or going straight). To compensate you could combine an aspect map with the slopes and assume that that a certain aspect is uphill and the opposite is downhill...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Below a link to a thread on hiking speeds, that might be interesting:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/thread/105552"&gt;Hiking equation in python returns wrong results&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Kind regards, Xander&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Aug 2014 13:25:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738963#M10714</guid>
      <dc:creator>XanderBakker</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-20T13:25:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738964#M10715</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you Xander. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't know what an aspect map is, but I will do a bit of research.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Juan&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:46:44 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738964#M10715</guid>
      <dc:creator>Juan_Poblete</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-22T09:46:44Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Analyst to assess multiple loops</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738965#M10716</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://resources.arcgis.com/en/help/main/10.2/index.html#//009z000000tr000000"&gt;slope aspect&lt;/A&gt;...the direction a slope faces&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Aug 2014 09:51:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/spatial-analyst-to-assess-multiple-loops/m-p/738965#M10716</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2014-08-22T09:51:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

