<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Viewshed analysis in forested area in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736616#M10693</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jordan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the points that would be on top of the forest, these would be null then wouldn't they as they cannot penetrate the forest canopy.&amp;nbsp; So you could just filter out these points and not run them and only run the points that are on the path.&amp;nbsp; These would then give you the areas where visibility would be achieved.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Maybe oversimplifying, but worth a thought.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jeff&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JeffVan_Etten</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2013-09-02T07:53:26Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Viewshed analysis in forested area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736612#M10689</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm running viewshed analyses based on some countryside footpaths - I'm using a 5m DTM, but I want to incorporate more elements into this viewshed. I'll be converting shapefiles to rasters and assigning a z value so this can be added on top of the DTM.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;However, the problem I'm envisaging is that when I add elements where viewshed points are present, this viewshed point will naturally be placed at the same level of the new DTM with added elements. I want to somehow have the viewshed points at the height of the original DTM. For example, if a footpath is going through a forest (which has been added as an element from the original shapefile) I don't want the viewshed point to be on top of this forest, but instead at the DTM "ground level". I understand that there will be no visibility for such instances but I would nonetheless like to keep such points.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I have the viewshed points as a point class and a line class. Perhaps by converting these into rasters then assigning this the DTM z value this can then replace other cells (i.e. where added forestry elements exist).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I feel there's probably a way of doing this in Raster Calculator, but I'm not sure exactly of the pathway to follow.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Any help would be greatly appreciated!&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:15:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736612#M10689</guid>
      <dc:creator>JordanWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-02T19:15:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed analysis in forested area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736613#M10690</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;read up on the use of OFFSETA which must be incorporated into the shapefiles table to represent a viewers height (ie 2 m or whatever your want), your observer point will be set above the ground by this distance.&amp;nbsp; Similarly, you can add polygon's and their heights to the DEM giving the allusion of not seeing through the forest.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:20:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736613#M10690</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-02T19:20:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed analysis in forested area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736614#M10691</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I'm using an OFFSETA of 1.7 as the viewer height, but I want this viewshed point to be "pinned" to the height of the original DTM height as opposed to the newly created DTM with forestry etc.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 19:28:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736614#M10691</guid>
      <dc:creator>JordanWhite</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-02T19:28:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed analysis in forested area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736615#M10692</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;BLOCKQUOTE class="jive-quote"&gt;I'm using an OFFSETA of 1.7 as the viewer height, but I want this viewshed point to be "pinned" to the height of the original DTM height as opposed to the newly created DTM with forestry etc.&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Seems like you could do this by adding the elevations of interest to the point table using Extract Values To Points and doing a field calculation to appropriately populate OFFSETA.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Jul 2013 22:51:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736615#M10692</guid>
      <dc:creator>curtvprice</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-07-02T22:51:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed analysis in forested area</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736616#M10693</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jordan&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;For the points that would be on top of the forest, these would be null then wouldn't they as they cannot penetrate the forest canopy.&amp;nbsp; So you could just filter out these points and not run them and only run the points that are on the path.&amp;nbsp; These would then give you the areas where visibility would be achieved.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Maybe oversimplifying, but worth a thought.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Jeff&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Sep 2013 07:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/viewshed-analysis-in-forested-area/m-p/736616#M10693</guid>
      <dc:creator>JeffVan_Etten</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2013-09-02T07:53:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

