<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Two different results for viewshed analysis? in ArcGIS Spatial Analyst Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723909#M10500</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what analysis properties were set in both?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(check the Environments tab in the tools or the Results output after the tool is run)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2016-12-22T00:39:45Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Two different results for viewshed analysis?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723908#M10499</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I think there might be a problem with a DEM I'm using to ran a viewshed analysis of a coastal area (88mt above sea level).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I've ran the tool twice, analysing the same area except the second analysis covers up a larger area. My results on the second analysis are really confusing:&amp;nbsp;the west, north-west quadrant is either skipped or deemed not visible. I think this is incorrect because: a) I've been to the site, b) on the previous analysis, the area is indeed visible. I set up an observer at 16mt above the ground and only then I'm getting the area visible again.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any ideas on what could be wrong, and how could I fix this? I'm attaching images of my first two results.&amp;nbsp;For the two analyses I ran, I clipped the same source DEM.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="viewshed workin" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/288182_1er analisis.PNG" style="width: 620px; height: 425px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-2 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/288183_2do analisis.PNG" style="width: 620px; height: 465px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:15:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723908#M10499</guid>
      <dc:creator>GalaNuñez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-22T00:15:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two different results for viewshed analysis?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723909#M10500</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;what analysis properties were set in both?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;(check the Environments tab in the tools or the Results output after the tool is run)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 00:39:45 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723909#M10500</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-22T00:39:45Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two different results for viewshed analysis?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723910#M10501</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are the properties for the&amp;nbsp;second analysis (incorrect one).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="288192" alt="" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/288192_results.PNG" style="width: 620px; height: 457px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and for the first analysis (correct one):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG alt="" class="image-2 jive-image j-img-original" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/288212_results2.PNG" style="width: 620px; height: 459px;" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 01:06:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723910#M10501</guid>
      <dc:creator>GalaNuñez</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-22T01:06:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Two different results for viewshed analysis?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723911#M10502</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;one plus sign off... the 'inputs' of the two will actually give you the tool specific environment settings.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 Dec 2016 03:07:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-spatial-analyst-questions/two-different-results-for-viewshed-analysis/m-p/723911#M10502</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2016-12-22T03:07:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

