<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic GeoProcessing Pack Routing performance concerns in ArcGIS Runtime SDK for WPF (Retired) Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-runtime-sdk-for-wpf-retired-questions/geoprocessing-pack-routing-performance-concerns/m-p/11818#M44</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We're seeing some concerning performance issues related to routing using local data via the GeoProcessing tools.&amp;nbsp; Thanks to Ralf we were able to get a functional gp model to create a gpk for routing.&amp;nbsp; I tried creating two packs, one using just the data for Arvada, CO, and one using the data for 10 states (Western US + Alaska).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Inside ArcMap creating a route using Arvada's data took 3 seconds.&amp;nbsp; Using the gpk via Runtime took 4 seconds (this is for a very short route, maybe 2 miles total).&amp;nbsp; This is a long time for a short route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I saw the same results using the 10-state pack as the Arvada pack.&amp;nbsp; That is good because it means performance is the same irregardless of data size after startup.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After that it seems to be almost a linear progression of distance to time.&amp;nbsp; A route from Longmont, CO to Arvada, CO took 11 seconds to build, and a route from Laramie, WY to Arvada, CO took 17 seconds to build.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is much slower than the routing engine in MapObjects, and even Bing web services takes less than a second for the same route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It seems like there are serious performance concerns for doing routing via the GeoProcessing tasks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JamesMcElroy</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2011-09-13T21:59:11Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>GeoProcessing Pack Routing performance concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-runtime-sdk-for-wpf-retired-questions/geoprocessing-pack-routing-performance-concerns/m-p/11818#M44</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We're seeing some concerning performance issues related to routing using local data via the GeoProcessing tools.&amp;nbsp; Thanks to Ralf we were able to get a functional gp model to create a gpk for routing.&amp;nbsp; I tried creating two packs, one using just the data for Arvada, CO, and one using the data for 10 states (Western US + Alaska).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Inside ArcMap creating a route using Arvada's data took 3 seconds.&amp;nbsp; Using the gpk via Runtime took 4 seconds (this is for a very short route, maybe 2 miles total).&amp;nbsp; This is a long time for a short route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;I saw the same results using the 10-state pack as the Arvada pack.&amp;nbsp; That is good because it means performance is the same irregardless of data size after startup.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;After that it seems to be almost a linear progression of distance to time.&amp;nbsp; A route from Longmont, CO to Arvada, CO took 11 seconds to build, and a route from Laramie, WY to Arvada, CO took 17 seconds to build.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;This is much slower than the routing engine in MapObjects, and even Bing web services takes less than a second for the same route.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;It seems like there are serious performance concerns for doing routing via the GeoProcessing tasks.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;James&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Sep 2011 21:59:11 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-runtime-sdk-for-wpf-retired-questions/geoprocessing-pack-routing-performance-concerns/m-p/11818#M44</guid>
      <dc:creator>JamesMcElroy</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-13T21:59:11Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: GeoProcessing Pack Routing performance concerns</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-runtime-sdk-for-wpf-retired-questions/geoprocessing-pack-routing-performance-concerns/m-p/11819#M45</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;We're also using a gpk built from a model in order to perform routing operations through WPF code. We've seen that only the first route per session takes longer (about 7-8 seconds), and the rest of the routes, long routes as well as short ones, take about 3 seconds.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Naturally, we only initialize the geoprocessing service and the geoprocessor object only once per session.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;When you run the model you've built in ArcMap on the Network Dataset and try to perform the same route operation - is the performance any better?&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:54:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-runtime-sdk-for-wpf-retired-questions/geoprocessing-pack-routing-performance-concerns/m-p/11819#M45</guid>
      <dc:creator>MiriRevivo</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2011-09-26T10:54:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

