<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic // in Qt Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/qt-maps-sdk-questions/unreadable-title/m-p/696652#M3547</link>
    <description />
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 00:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>_____</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-05-26T00:28:43Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>//</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/qt-maps-sdk-questions/unreadable-title/m-p/696652#M3547</link>
      <description />
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 00:28:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/qt-maps-sdk-questions/unreadable-title/m-p/696652#M3547</guid>
      <dc:creator>_____</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-05-26T00:28:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Is it okay to have relationship classes in the geodatabase?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/qt-maps-sdk-questions/unreadable-title/m-p/696653#M3548</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It is ok to have them, but we don't support interacting with them in 100.0 (there is no API to query/edit related tables). However, we are adding support for this with 100.1, which will be out in the coming weeks.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jun 2017 17:28:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/qt-maps-sdk-questions/unreadable-title/m-p/696653#M3548</guid>
      <dc:creator>LucasDanzinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-06-12T17:28:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

