<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Quartz Thick-Client JavaFX Distro license model and cost? in Java Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/java-maps-sdk-questions/quartz-thick-client-javafx-distro-license-model/m-p/254273#M740</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Howdy Eric Bader - long time no see!&amp;nbsp; (it's the Other Eric)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you point me to a person or resource that'll allow us to calc the distro licensing fees for a thick client JavaFX app running Quartz against offline maps that we create ourselves?&amp;nbsp; We won't be using any server-based geo processing tools as we're snapping this in to an existing geospatial kit that we've had for years.&amp;nbsp; We need a fresh look to our map viewer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you may remember we have many years of experience w/ArcGIS runtime in every flavor ever put out, and recently we've cranked out a JavaFX app that beats on every capability of locally running FXMaps in 10.2.4 Beta - and there are issues - so we're switching over to Quartz starting today and plan on re-releasing a patch to our app as soon as Quartz 1.0 is final'd.&amp;nbsp; (sweating bullets here on Q1/2016 expected release somewhat!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About a year ago we were told that thick-client desktop seat licenses for local 10.2.4 was at a decent price per seat, we want to insure we're close to that mark before we fully commit as we have a tight margin on 3rd-party license costs (I'd really hate to pick up some other vendor's map viewer!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric H.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EricHolsinger</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2015-10-27T11:32:02Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Quartz Thick-Client JavaFX Distro license model and cost?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/java-maps-sdk-questions/quartz-thick-client-javafx-distro-license-model/m-p/254273#M740</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Howdy Eric Bader - long time no see!&amp;nbsp; (it's the Other Eric)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you point me to a person or resource that'll allow us to calc the distro licensing fees for a thick client JavaFX app running Quartz against offline maps that we create ourselves?&amp;nbsp; We won't be using any server-based geo processing tools as we're snapping this in to an existing geospatial kit that we've had for years.&amp;nbsp; We need a fresh look to our map viewer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;As you may remember we have many years of experience w/ArcGIS runtime in every flavor ever put out, and recently we've cranked out a JavaFX app that beats on every capability of locally running FXMaps in 10.2.4 Beta - and there are issues - so we're switching over to Quartz starting today and plan on re-releasing a patch to our app as soon as Quartz 1.0 is final'd.&amp;nbsp; (sweating bullets here on Q1/2016 expected release somewhat!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;About a year ago we were told that thick-client desktop seat licenses for local 10.2.4 was at a decent price per seat, we want to insure we're close to that mark before we fully commit as we have a tight margin on 3rd-party license costs (I'd really hate to pick up some other vendor's map viewer!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Eric H.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Oct 2015 11:32:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/java-maps-sdk-questions/quartz-thick-client-javafx-distro-license-model/m-p/254273#M740</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricHolsinger</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-10-27T11:32:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Quartz Thick-Client JavaFX Distro license model and cost?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/java-maps-sdk-questions/quartz-thick-client-javafx-distro-license-model/m-p/254274#M741</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Eric,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Just getting to this. Sorry about that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This sounds fascinating and I am interested in learning more. Can we chat offline?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Final for Java has been 'adjusted' to Q2 2016. Probably June or UC 2016 time frame.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Cost, from a Quartz standpoint, is going to be hard to calculate. As of right now, the business model has not been settled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 16 Nov 2015 18:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/java-maps-sdk-questions/quartz-thick-client-javafx-distro-license-model/m-p/254274#M741</guid>
      <dc:creator>EricBader</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2015-11-16T18:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

