<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)? in .NET Maps SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747246#M9336</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would need two rectangles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>dotMorten_esri</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2017-09-05T23:35:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747242#M9332</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi, when I draw a polygon that crosses the 180 meridian, I'm pleased that the polygon is rendered correctly right out of the box without doing anything special in the ESRI ArcGIS SDK for .NET 100.1.0&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, is there is similar feature or workaround or setting if the polygon cuts across the top of the world map? e.g. a long rectangle extending northward at longitude 180 that crosses the north pole would be expected to reappear at longitude 0 on the opposite side of the world. Or do I have to draw two rectangles myself?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance for any comments, advice or insights.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;best rgds&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;PJ&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 08:10:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747242#M9332</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parh_JinChia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T08:10:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747243#M9333</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;try a polar stereographic projection&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Sep 2017 10:32:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747243#M9333</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-04T10:32:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747244#M9334</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Dan, but I don't want to change my projection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I want my map to be normal looking.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:01:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747244#M9334</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parh_JinChia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-05T03:01:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747245#M9335</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You had better show a screen grab of your map to explain ... Web Mercator is hardly 'normal' and a Stereoscopic projection is close to being one... albeit from a different vantage point&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 03:12:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747245#M9335</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-05T03:12:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747246#M9336</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;You would need two rectangles.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 Sep 2017 23:35:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747246#M9336</guid>
      <dc:creator>dotMorten_esri</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-05T23:35:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: wraparound for the poles (90 degrees latitude)?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747247#M9337</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks Morten, I will do that.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Sep 2017 00:18:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/net-maps-sdk-questions/wraparound-for-the-poles-90-degrees-latitude/m-p/747247#M9337</guid>
      <dc:creator>Parh_JinChia</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2017-09-06T00:18:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

