<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>idea Layout improvements at reports in ArcGIS Reality for ArcGIS Pro Ideas</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-reality-for-arcgis-pro-ideas/layout-improvements-at-reports/idi-p/1671914</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The Adjustment Report is a nice feature to summarize the processing steps, expected quality and the basic settings, however it could be improved especially at the "Camera Calibration" section:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Distortion parameters are not labelled. We get six numbers, probably four K constants and two P constants. Which one is which the first four are the K-s (K₁; K₂; K₃; K₄)? Followed by the P-s? It is also interesting, that we have just three K-s at the user interface, but four is printed. It would be nice to have them like this:&amp;nbsp;K₁: 0.0001... etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. At the pixel size the unit is "&lt;SPAN&gt;um" which meant to be micrometers. Here, there is no reason to use the ASCII only, it would be better to see "µm" instead. (Micro sign in UTF-8). It should be also synchronized with the user interface at camera properties at the beginning, where the UI says "microns".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ákos Halmai&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ÁkosHalmai</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-12-10T10:18:06Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Layout improvements at reports</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-reality-for-arcgis-pro-ideas/layout-improvements-at-reports/idi-p/1671914</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The Adjustment Report is a nice feature to summarize the processing steps, expected quality and the basic settings, however it could be improved especially at the "Camera Calibration" section:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Distortion parameters are not labelled. We get six numbers, probably four K constants and two P constants. Which one is which the first four are the K-s (K₁; K₂; K₃; K₄)? Followed by the P-s? It is also interesting, that we have just three K-s at the user interface, but four is printed. It would be nice to have them like this:&amp;nbsp;K₁: 0.0001... etc.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. At the pixel size the unit is "&lt;SPAN&gt;um" which meant to be micrometers. Here, there is no reason to use the ASCII only, it would be better to see "µm" instead. (Micro sign in UTF-8). It should be also synchronized with the user interface at camera properties at the beginning, where the UI says "microns".&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Best regards,&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Ákos Halmai&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 10:18:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-reality-for-arcgis-pro-ideas/layout-improvements-at-reports/idi-p/1671914</guid>
      <dc:creator>ÁkosHalmai</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-12-10T10:18:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

