<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ArcGIS Pro Addin distributing in ArcGIS Pro SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1165573#M8043</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My organisation (public sector) wants to distribute ArcGIS Pro add-ins and their source code that this organisation has made under MIT license (a permissive free software license) in public git repository, so that end-users can freely download code. Is this ok thing to do considering Esri agreements?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One of this add-ins uses Estonian official address data search service to find and show on map in ArcGIS Pro desktop correct / official addresses (only for Estonia), is this something&amp;nbsp;that might compete with Esri Offerings as mentioned in this post:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-licensing/td-p/1037024" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-licensing/td-p/1037024&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>kirken</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-04-19T11:26:42Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ArcGIS Pro Addin distributing</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1165573#M8043</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My organisation (public sector) wants to distribute ArcGIS Pro add-ins and their source code that this organisation has made under MIT license (a permissive free software license) in public git repository, so that end-users can freely download code. Is this ok thing to do considering Esri agreements?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;One of this add-ins uses Estonian official address data search service to find and show on map in ArcGIS Pro desktop correct / official addresses (only for Estonia), is this something&amp;nbsp;that might compete with Esri Offerings as mentioned in this post:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-licensing/td-p/1037024" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-licensing/td-p/1037024&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:26:42 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1165573#M8043</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-19T11:26:42Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro Addin distributing</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1166392#M8047</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello, yes, you are free to distribute your own Pro add-ins and code.&amp;nbsp; I’m not sure about the MIT license, that would be up to you to determine which license is appropriate for your needs.&amp;nbsp; Regarding distribution, you can also consider creating an add-in listing on ArcGIS Online, and information on creating a listing is found &lt;A href="https://github.com/esri/arcgis-pro-sdk/wiki/ProConcepts-Distributing-Add-Ins-Online" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Regarding the search service, an add-in which utilizes a third-party address search service and displays results in Pro would not be an issue.&amp;nbsp; The licensed copy of Pro is all that is required.&amp;nbsp; Esri and Esri Partners have similar offerings for geocoding and address search, and you are free to build your own tools.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just FYI, some further considerations &lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/en-us/about/partners/become-partner" target="_self"&gt;here&lt;/A&gt; on the Esri Partner Program.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;For any questions or comments, please tag Original Publisher -&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/760741"&gt;@ChristopherZent&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;("Anonymous User")&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 06 Feb 2024 02:11:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1166392#M8047</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-06T02:11:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ArcGIS Pro Addin distributing</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1166977#M8057</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the reply!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2022 12:53:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/arcgis-pro-addin-distributing/m-p/1166977#M8057</guid>
      <dc:creator>kirken</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-22T12:53:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

