<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Downsides of using Shapefiles vs &amp;quot;regular&amp;quot; FeatureClass/FeatureLayer in ArcGIS Pro SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807346#M2235</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This pretty well sums it up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/appendices/geoprocessing-considerations-for-shapefile-output.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/appendices/geoprocessing-considerations-for-shapefile-output.htm"&gt;Geoprocessing considerations for shapefile output—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but if you are just creating them and not doing anything analysis/geoprocessing wise, then you will have to evaluate it in that light.&amp;nbsp; Be aware of the file size limit should your 800K polygon approach that limit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-09-10T09:35:13Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Downsides of using Shapefiles vs "regular" FeatureClass/FeatureLayer</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807345#M2234</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hey,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;as I mentioned in an &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/thread/196147-poor-performance-when-creating-polylines"&gt;older post&lt;/A&gt;, I have quite some performance issues with ArcGIS Pro. Especially when I have to create like 800k polygons or something and put them on a layer it takes ages.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;However, I found out that it is much much faster to create a Shapefile (with the DotSpatial library) that contains the polygons and then I can simply add the Shapefile to the project. Speedup is like factor 20.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, performance wise I actually have no choice going down this road but I wonder if there are any negative impacts that I don't know of yet? Are there any downsides of shapefiles vs using regular FeatureClasses/FeatureLayers that are stored in the ArcGIS project? Note that I rarely have to modify these objects individually.. instead all of the 800k polygons are nuked and created from scratch when changes are necessary.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks in advance&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:19:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807345#M2234</guid>
      <dc:creator>RehmSoftware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T09:19:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Downsides of using Shapefiles vs "regular" FeatureClass/FeatureLayer</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807346#M2235</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;This pretty well sums it up&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/appendices/geoprocessing-considerations-for-shapefile-output.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/tool-reference/appendices/geoprocessing-considerations-for-shapefile-output.htm"&gt;Geoprocessing considerations for shapefile output—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;but if you are just creating them and not doing anything analysis/geoprocessing wise, then you will have to evaluate it in that light.&amp;nbsp; Be aware of the file size limit should your 800K polygon approach that limit&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 09:35:13 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807346#M2235</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T09:35:13Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Downsides of using Shapefiles vs "regular" FeatureClass/FeatureLayer</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807347#M2236</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;you're right, that pretty much sums it up, thanks a lot. I think I can live with these limitations especially since my polygons are actually triangles so I think I can fit around 20 million triangles into the shapefile.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Again, I'd rather not use shapefiles but since creating so many objects is super slow for regular FeatureClasses/FeatureLayers in the ArcGIS Pro project, I've got no other apparent choice..&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Best regards&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Christian&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2020 11:46:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/downsides-of-using-shapefiles-vs-quot-regular-quot/m-p/807347#M2236</guid>
      <dc:creator>RehmSoftware</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-09-10T11:46:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

