<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: licensing backstage does not show external extension in ArcGIS Pro SDK Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735932#M198</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Roman,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Licensing sample should work fine for you given a Pro 2.2.2 installation.&amp;nbsp; If you have had success compiling and running other samples, then as long as the Licensing sample add-in is in a well-known folder, you should indeed see the "External Extensions" entry appear on the Licensing tab.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps&amp;nbsp;check the add-in manager to ensure the add-in is showing as installed.&amp;nbsp; If not, you might also double-check the Config.daml to ensure you have set the add-in's desktopVersion="2.0.0".&amp;nbsp; If you have an older set of 1.x samples installed, these would by default not have the newer value set and would not load in a Pro 2.x installation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 18:34:50 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2018-10-01T18:34:50Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>licensing backstage does not show external extension</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735931#M197</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am evaluating the sample &lt;A href="https://github.com/Esri/arcgis-pro-sdk-community-samples/tree/master/Framework/Licensing"&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #586069; background-color: #ffffff; font-weight: 600;"&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;arcgis-pro-sdk-community-samples&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #586069; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #586069; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Framework&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #586069; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;/&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;STRONG class="" style="color: #24292e; background-color: #ffffff; font-weight: 600;"&gt;Licensing&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;SPAN class="" style="color: #586069; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;/ as an A&lt;SPAN style="color: #24292e;"&gt;dd-in that should implement the configurable extension pattern in Pro shown on the licensing tab on the ArcGIS Pro application backstage as an &lt;STRONG&gt;External Extension&lt;/STRONG&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Unfortunately there is no &lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;External Extension&lt;/STRONG&gt; entry on the licensing tab backstage (between Esri Extensions and Settings. I cannot find any restrictions preventing the sample to achieve this issue! The sample is &lt;STRONG&gt;unchanged&lt;/STRONG&gt; (including &lt;SPAN&gt;an&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;CODE style="background-color: rgba(27, 31, 35, 0.05); padding: 0.2em 0.4em;"&gt;&amp;lt;&lt;STRONG&gt;extensionConfig&lt;/STRONG&gt; .../&amp;gt;&lt;/CODE&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;element to Config.daml&lt;/SPAN&gt;). Can you give me&amp;nbsp;some&amp;nbsp;helpful hint?&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #24292e;"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="About ArcGIS Pro" class="image-1 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/423398_About ArcGIS Pro.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff; color: #24292e;"&gt;&lt;IMG alt="Licensing ArcGIS Pro" class="image-2 jive-image j-img-original" src="/legacyfs/online/423399_Licensing ArcGIS Pro.jpg" /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 17:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735931#M197</guid>
      <dc:creator>RomanTrojan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T17:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: licensing backstage does not show external extension</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735932#M198</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hello Roman,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The Licensing sample should work fine for you given a Pro 2.2.2 installation.&amp;nbsp; If you have had success compiling and running other samples, then as long as the Licensing sample add-in is in a well-known folder, you should indeed see the "External Extensions" entry appear on the Licensing tab.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps&amp;nbsp;check the add-in manager to ensure the add-in is showing as installed.&amp;nbsp; If not, you might also double-check the Config.daml to ensure you have set the add-in's desktopVersion="2.0.0".&amp;nbsp; If you have an older set of 1.x samples installed, these would by default not have the newer value set and would not load in a Pro 2.x installation.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 01 Oct 2018 18:34:50 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735932#M198</guid>
      <dc:creator>Anonymous User</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-01T18:34:50Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: licensing backstage does not show external extension</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735933#M199</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you, Christopher, very much!&lt;BR /&gt;The mess was caused by another external extension with configured &amp;lt;extensionConfig&amp;nbsp;... hasExtendedInfo="true"/&amp;gt; entry, but without correct&amp;nbsp;IExtensionConfig implementation. Such DLL positioned in &lt;SPAN style="background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;a well-known&amp;nbsp;&lt;/SPAN&gt;or optional AddIn folder&amp;nbsp;supposedly obstructs license&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #24292e; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;configuration for all other properly installed external extensions like Licensing sample. The&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #24292e; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;SPAN style="color: #3d3d3d;"&gt;desktopVersion setting or&amp;nbsp;hasExtendedInfo flag set to "false" work as&amp;nbsp;expected (impacting particular extension).&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2018 14:14:06 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-sdk-questions/licensing-backstage-does-not-show-external/m-p/735933#M199</guid>
      <dc:creator>RomanTrojan</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2018-10-02T14:14:06Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

