<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Layouts vs. Reports in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1633034#M97232</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/115587"&gt;@MobiusSnake&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In a few cases it was easier to mimic a report by using a map series rather than trying to get Pro to behave in the Report.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For me it was the ability to control the exact page layout and object size in a Layout vs trying to work around the edge cases without 'weird pages' in a Report.&lt;BR /&gt;It is a case of&amp;nbsp; "Can I get a pdf 'report' created for that one job" vs having a robust report layout for the next few years, where all data is controlled and it justifies time spent making it reliable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I feel both approaches are useable to generate a report-like output. Best you try a creating few Reports and see if there are any hiccups created by your specific requirements.&lt;BR /&gt;Keep in mind that with dynamic tables, all sorts of dynamic text, and attachment inserts, over &amp;amp; above all the mappy things, Layouts with a map series may just give you something nicer that is less bipolar than Reports.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-15T04:56:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Layouts vs. Reports</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1632806#M97202</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi all,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I have some map production tools which I originally built in 2013 for ArcMap 10.0, using ArcObjects and C#.&amp;nbsp; A few years ago I converted them to Python and made them work with Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm getting ready to do a third major iteration given some updated requirements and I'm considering modifying the tools so instead of using layouts to generate PDFs, they use Pro reports instead.&amp;nbsp; I don't know much about reports though, would appreciate hearing from anyone regarding:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Do they have any significant advantages or disadvantages versus using layouts?&amp;nbsp; The layouts currently being used involve a lot of elements like labels and tables with spatial filters based on the map extent(s).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Have you automated their creation, and ever run into any major blockers in the process?&amp;nbsp; Specifically, have you ever hit any gaps in ArcPy where you've tried to do something and it just isn't possible?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Map series aren't part of these tools, so any differences involving those isn't important.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2025 12:30:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1632806#M97202</guid>
      <dc:creator>MobiusSnake</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-14T12:30:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layouts vs. Reports</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1633034#M97232</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/115587"&gt;@MobiusSnake&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;In a few cases it was easier to mimic a report by using a map series rather than trying to get Pro to behave in the Report.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;For me it was the ability to control the exact page layout and object size in a Layout vs trying to work around the edge cases without 'weird pages' in a Report.&lt;BR /&gt;It is a case of&amp;nbsp; "Can I get a pdf 'report' created for that one job" vs having a robust report layout for the next few years, where all data is controlled and it justifies time spent making it reliable.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I feel both approaches are useable to generate a report-like output. Best you try a creating few Reports and see if there are any hiccups created by your specific requirements.&lt;BR /&gt;Keep in mind that with dynamic tables, all sorts of dynamic text, and attachment inserts, over &amp;amp; above all the mappy things, Layouts with a map series may just give you something nicer that is less bipolar than Reports.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 04:56:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1633034#M97232</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-15T04:56:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Layouts vs. Reports</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1677396#M101181</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello!&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;A couple of big limitation of Reports I found are the inability to insert a Legend into them. I also don't see the ability to dynamically update a map extent or content based on what's showing on each page as you can with a page filter in Map Series.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Jan 2026 20:49:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/layouts-vs-reports/m-p/1677396#M101181</guid>
      <dc:creator>AbigailMcHenry</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-01-12T20:49:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

