<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Please report any weird behaviour in Pro in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633009#M97229</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;And I’ll respectfully add for the sake of others who are newest to Pro, update your version only when necessary. If it ain’t broke, it might be after an update.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 01:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Eugene_Adkins</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-07-15T01:59:10Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Please report any weird behaviour in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633005#M97228</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;In my opinion, if you experience &lt;U&gt;any&lt;/U&gt; unusual or unexpected behaviour in ArcGIS Pro, lodge a support case.&lt;BR /&gt;Here is why:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In another discussion, Esri staff mentioned that they have a bug list that is not public and that they rely on users lodging support cases to judge when/if these bugs are to be handled.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;Quote:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"We do have an internal bug. Currently it is sitting in our backlog. I do not know when we will get to it. I'll make note of your query and perhaps it might be something we can bump up in priority.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Unfortunately, this internal bug cannot be tracked outside of Esri. If you want to keep track of this issue you should&amp;nbsp;contact&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://support.esri.com/en/contact-tech-support" target="_self" rel="nofollow noopener noreferrer"&gt;support&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;and enter a bug with them.&amp;nbsp;Entering an issue with support also helps us gage how many are being affected by a bug and helps us prioritize our work.&amp;nbsp;Having a bug number generated from a customer such as yourself makes a real difference. "&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This particular case revolves around weirdness in the pdf export options of a map series.&lt;BR /&gt;I have experienced the issue but thought it just quirky and have not lodged a case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now I hear from Esri staff that it is an internal known bug, but on the backburner until enough people &lt;STRIKE&gt;complain&lt;/STRIKE&gt; lodge cases (with enough supporting info that the regional resellers are in a position to forward them on to Esri Inc).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;From a technical &amp;amp; resourcing perspective I understand the process and the reason why these processes and cases exist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;From a small business perspective, paying a lot for licenses to give my clients the best results possible, I am frustrated as I know the local reseller will not pass on my issue to Esri Inc unless they can reliably replicate the issue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I feel the time required for both myself and the local reseller to replicate, test, document, etc an already known issue is very inefficient and there has to be a better way.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Until we (Esri and clients) find a better way to track issues, all I can come up with is to just lodge any and all behaviour that is unexpected; at the least, it will help everyone that is subject to an unlisted bug that is sitting on a shelf waiting for attention.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If you read this while at UC please raise your concerns with the Esri people you intersect and give us "ROW, Dusty" people some feedback.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 01:50:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633005#M97228</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-15T01:50:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please report any weird behaviour in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633009#M97229</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;And I’ll respectfully add for the sake of others who are newest to Pro, update your version only when necessary. If it ain’t broke, it might be after an update.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 15 Jul 2025 01:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633009#M97229</guid>
      <dc:creator>Eugene_Adkins</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-15T01:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please report any weird behaviour in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633962#M97318</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;To add on, I never download a .0 version of the software. I always wait for a patch to be posted.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 16:38:31 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1633962#M97318</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayColeman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T16:38:31Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please report any weird behaviour in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1634056#M97339</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/147970"&gt;@Eugene_Adkins&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/260311"&gt;@JayColeman&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;LOL - it was broke and I had to try something to be more productive. I almost never get the .0 but in this case I couldn't stand the 3.3 license checking issue any longer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I had hoped they had fixed all the 3.3. &amp;amp; 3.4 issues without introducing a new doozy. I did not have a Copy &amp;gt; Crash bug on my Bingo card...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Once you fall foul of the combo of a bad bug and a new great feature you are stuck in purgatory&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:"&gt;🤣&lt;/span&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Give up the quality of life of the new feature to go back to an older version without either; or hope that the next update will fix the bug but not break something else.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 23:56:28 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1634056#M97339</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T23:56:28Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Please report any weird behaviour in Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1634057#M97340</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;If you're lucky enough the .0 will be so bad that Esri pulls it and you can only get the .1&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:"&gt;🤣&lt;/span&gt;&lt;span class="lia-unicode-emoji" title=":rolling_on_the_floor_laughing:"&gt;🤣&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jul 2025 23:57:09 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/please-report-any-weird-behaviour-in-pro/m-p/1634057#M97340</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-07-17T23:57:09Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

