<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617498#M95989</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The steps I was using to create a Hillshade layer, detailed below, were not the best approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;From over 200 smaller DEMs, I had created a city-wide raster.tif DEM.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Then I used this city-wide DEM to build the Hillshade raster, first using the &lt;A title="Hillshade function" href="http://%20https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/raster-functions/hillshade-function.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Hillshade function&lt;/A&gt; and then trying the &lt;A title="GP Tool Hillshade" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.3/tool-reference/3d-analyst/hillshade.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;GP Tool Hillshade&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Both yielded the same fuzzy result.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;A colleague at &lt;A title="CT ECO" href="https://maps.cteco.uconn.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;CT ECO&lt;/A&gt;, who had built out the &lt;A title="CT statewide hilldshade" href="https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4c801e35f200493ebffddf7b7b10a2e0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Connecticut statewide hilldshade&lt;/A&gt;, recommended creating a Mosaic Raster dataset referencing the individual DEM tiffs.&amp;nbsp; Then using the GP Tool Hillshade, I was able to create a nice clean Hillshade layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The result is much better at 1:240.&amp;nbsp; Hope this can help somebody else. . . .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132956i6B2055ADC24315F9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" alt="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was how the old/wrong approach looked:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132958iA0E9486467ACA075/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" alt="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the replies just the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PLadd</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-05-22T13:18:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1550228#M89301</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I am trying to create a hillshade from a mosaic dataset I created from DEMs for portions of Massachusetts, Connecticut, and Rhode Island. My mosaic raster looks correct, but the hillshade tool creates a strange grid pattern not at all representing the elevation data in the mosaic. I am not sure what would cause this or how to resolve it. Thoughts?&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kwatter48_0-1729291383123.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/117643iF0D9AC3F9AF1DA0C/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kwatter48_0-1729291383123.png" alt="kwatter48_0-1729291383123.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Mosaic DEM above&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="kwatter48_1-1729291433288.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/117644iF016BE82A57AB89D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="kwatter48_1-1729291433288.png" alt="kwatter48_1-1729291433288.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hillshade product from tool.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Oct 2024 22:45:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1550228#M89301</guid>
      <dc:creator>kwatter48</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-18T22:45:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1550681#M89351</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting!&amp;nbsp; So a question for you - what is the coordinate system of the raster mosaic?&amp;nbsp; Is it a geographic or projected coordinate system?&amp;nbsp; If geographic (i.e. WGS 1984 for example), I would recommend you run the Project Raster GP tool first to UTM or Stateplane.&amp;nbsp; Then run the Raster Function again.&amp;nbsp; Does the output change to expected results?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 21 Oct 2024 21:36:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1550681#M89351</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-10-21T21:36:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1616987#M95932</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/845867"&gt;@kwatter48&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;did you ever resolve this?&amp;nbsp; I am running into a similar problem (also in CT).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;At a scale of around 1600, it looks normal:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_0-1747836976598.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132790iBE7AA5EC6205C3A7/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_0-1747836976598.png" alt="PLadd_0-1747836976598.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;But if I zoom in one more roll of the mouse wheel, it looks horrible (like I'm watching reruns on an old black &amp;amp; white TV using an antenna):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_1-1747837015851.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132791i49BBBA9F201F0750/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_1-1747837015851.png" alt="PLadd_1-1747837015851.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This is how bad it gets at 1:240:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_2-1747837201717.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132793i27CE70397AA77E1E/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_2-1747837201717.png" alt="PLadd_2-1747837201717.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Same area/scale from an older hillshade created using ArcMap and an older DEM:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_3-1747837256441.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132794iF97F2B7790021FDC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_3-1747837256441.png" alt="PLadd_3-1747837256441.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To answer&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/2538"&gt;@Robert_LeClair&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;question, as least for me, I am using CT Stateplane projection.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 14:22:08 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1616987#M95932</guid>
      <dc:creator>PLadd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-21T14:22:08Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617031#M95939</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Interesting...with regards to your Mosaic Dataset, have you built overviews for the MDS?&amp;nbsp; Also, can you share the data with me so I may test on my side to figure out what's going on?&amp;nbsp; Thx!&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 15:08:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617031#M95939</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-21T15:08:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617040#M95941</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;maybe bump this setting way up &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;"Maximum Number of Rasters Per Mosaic"&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or do that and then blow out the existing overview and recreate them&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;or do that and create a fresh file geodatabase, fresh mosaic dataset, etc.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 21 May 2025 15:22:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617040#M95941</guid>
      <dc:creator>BillFox</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-21T15:22:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Hillshade Tool Returns Strange Grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617498#M95989</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The steps I was using to create a Hillshade layer, detailed below, were not the best approach.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;From over 200 smaller DEMs, I had created a city-wide raster.tif DEM.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Then I used this city-wide DEM to build the Hillshade raster, first using the &lt;A title="Hillshade function" href="http://%20https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/help/analysis/raster-functions/hillshade-function.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Hillshade function&lt;/A&gt; and then trying the &lt;A title="GP Tool Hillshade" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/3.3/tool-reference/3d-analyst/hillshade.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;GP Tool Hillshade&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Both yielded the same fuzzy result.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;A colleague at &lt;A title="CT ECO" href="https://maps.cteco.uconn.edu/" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;CT ECO&lt;/A&gt;, who had built out the &lt;A title="CT statewide hilldshade" href="https://experience.arcgis.com/experience/4c801e35f200493ebffddf7b7b10a2e0" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Connecticut statewide hilldshade&lt;/A&gt;, recommended creating a Mosaic Raster dataset referencing the individual DEM tiffs.&amp;nbsp; Then using the GP Tool Hillshade, I was able to create a nice clean Hillshade layer.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The result is much better at 1:240.&amp;nbsp; Hope this can help somebody else. . . .&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132956i6B2055ADC24315F9/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" alt="PLadd_0-1747919455157.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This was how the old/wrong approach looked:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/132958iA0E9486467ACA075/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" alt="PLadd_2-1747919632476.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the replies just the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 22 May 2025 13:18:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/hillshade-tool-returns-strange-grid/m-p/1617498#M95989</guid>
      <dc:creator>PLadd</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-05-22T13:18:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

