<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: When is a Project(.APRX) too big? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/when-is-a-project-aprx-too-big/m-p/1579937#M92417</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I found this thread while researching a problem I'm having with a large .aprx file in Pro 3.3.&amp;nbsp; It has 25 layout tabs, and one map tab with about 100 layers, about 3/4s of them are vector, rest are raster some quite large (to about 2GB).&amp;nbsp; This aprx appears to have become bugged/defective: it can no longer export the georeferencing properly.&amp;nbsp; Nothing can read the world files it makes (and presumably the formats I've tested that write the reference into the file itself) Exports fine from a smaller aprx.&amp;nbsp; Lag isn't much of a problem with this large aprx, and the aprx file size on disk is only 3.2 MB.&amp;nbsp; But the georeferncing issue is a show stopper.&amp;nbsp; I can't really fix the exported raters after the fact, the exported rasters aren't just correctly located with no defined projection - its just plain wrong and the only fix would be manually georefernce it back via control points.&amp;nbsp; Currently I'm attempting to drop it all into a new aprx to see if I get the exact same problem - wondering if this bug I'm getting is stochastic or deterministic, if the later then I'll report it.&amp;nbsp; EDIT: I get the same problem with a totally fresh aprx, georef for tiffs is totally unworkable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 20:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KeithAddison1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-30T20:57:23Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>When is a Project(.APRX) too big?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/when-is-a-project-aprx-too-big/m-p/1159643#M53459</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;When is an ArcGIS PRO Project too big?&amp;nbsp; What is your practice on managing the theme, complexity, connections and purpose of project files?&amp;nbsp; I have practiced limiting my projects to themes and AOIs but Then I end up with many projects with few maps and a few projects with many maps.&amp;nbsp; I am sure there are limitations, but I have not hit many.&amp;nbsp; When the project gets slow or off subject I start a new project.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;One measure is the size of the Display Cache.&amp;nbsp; I do clear the cache regularly when performance becomes an issue .&amp;nbsp; I also frequently clear the %TEMP%&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="cache.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/37773i44BFD858E4919FDC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="cache.png" alt="cache.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2022 20:45:07 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/when-is-a-project-aprx-too-big/m-p/1159643#M53459</guid>
      <dc:creator>graharg_MAO</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-30T20:45:07Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: When is a Project(.APRX) too big?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/when-is-a-project-aprx-too-big/m-p/1579937#M92417</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I found this thread while researching a problem I'm having with a large .aprx file in Pro 3.3.&amp;nbsp; It has 25 layout tabs, and one map tab with about 100 layers, about 3/4s of them are vector, rest are raster some quite large (to about 2GB).&amp;nbsp; This aprx appears to have become bugged/defective: it can no longer export the georeferencing properly.&amp;nbsp; Nothing can read the world files it makes (and presumably the formats I've tested that write the reference into the file itself) Exports fine from a smaller aprx.&amp;nbsp; Lag isn't much of a problem with this large aprx, and the aprx file size on disk is only 3.2 MB.&amp;nbsp; But the georeferncing issue is a show stopper.&amp;nbsp; I can't really fix the exported raters after the fact, the exported rasters aren't just correctly located with no defined projection - its just plain wrong and the only fix would be manually georefernce it back via control points.&amp;nbsp; Currently I'm attempting to drop it all into a new aprx to see if I get the exact same problem - wondering if this bug I'm getting is stochastic or deterministic, if the later then I'll report it.&amp;nbsp; EDIT: I get the same problem with a totally fresh aprx, georef for tiffs is totally unworkable.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jan 2025 20:57:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/when-is-a-project-aprx-too-big/m-p/1579937#M92417</guid>
      <dc:creator>KeithAddison1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-30T20:57:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

