<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Relationship class with rules appearance in ArcGIS Pro in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1578991#M92305</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after adding rules to a relationship in order to limit relations with only some subtypes, I can see that it is not reflected in Pro interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here you can see that only Hydrant can have a relation with a hydrant inspection, however when selecting a Valve, the hydrant inspection relationship is still visible. Is this the normal behavior ? I would expect that the relationship is limited to valid subtypes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" style="width: 609px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124058i2BC2DD9CF3E070D9/image-dimensions/609x426?v=v2" width="609" height="426" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124059iA87D49C3DF31A263/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note :&amp;nbsp; when trying to add a hydrant maintenance in relation with a valve, I get the expected behavior :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124060i954726910A48490D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>PierreloupDucroix</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-26T22:55:46Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Relationship class with rules appearance in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1578991#M92305</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;after adding rules to a relationship in order to limit relations with only some subtypes, I can see that it is not reflected in Pro interface.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here you can see that only Hydrant can have a relation with a hydrant inspection, however when selecting a Valve, the hydrant inspection relationship is still visible. Is this the normal behavior ? I would expect that the relationship is limited to valid subtypes.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" style="width: 609px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124058i2BC2DD9CF3E070D9/image-dimensions/609x426?v=v2" width="609" height="426" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_0-1737931912446.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124059iA87D49C3DF31A263/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_1-1737931949158.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Note :&amp;nbsp; when trying to add a hydrant maintenance in relation with a valve, I get the expected behavior :&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/124060i954726910A48490D/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" alt="PierreloupDucroix_2-1737932107221.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2025 22:55:46 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1578991#M92305</guid>
      <dc:creator>PierreloupDucroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-26T22:55:46Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Relationship class with rules appearance in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1701789#M103162</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;So, just adding the Relationship Class Rules caused the error message?&amp;nbsp; I've tried reproducing this behavior with no success... I am still able to add a maintenance records to the Hydrant Maintenance table when features other than Fire Hydrant are selected.&amp;nbsp; I'm wondering if a Validation Attribute Rule would be the way to go... my fear is that editors will accidentally add maintenance records to the wrong tables... I was hoping there was a way to only show relationship classes per subtype, but haven't figured it out yet.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 15:30:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1701789#M103162</guid>
      <dc:creator>MHeadley</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-13T15:30:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Relationship class with rules appearance in ArcGIS Pro</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1701907#M103176</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;Hello, I opened a support case a year ago, and the bug has been reproduced and referenced here:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.esri.com/fr-fr/bug/rules-enabled-on-a-relationship-class-are-not-honored-b-bug-000176986" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.esri.com/fr-fr/bug/rules-enabled-on-a-relationship-class-are-not-honored-b-bug-000176986&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;I also found another bug that seems to describe the same behavior:&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.esri.com/fr-fr/bug/relationship-class-rules-that-are-set-to-restrict-relat-bug-000136199" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;https://support.esri.com/fr-fr/bug/relationship-class-rules-that-are-set-to-restrict-relat-bug-000136199&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;&lt;SPAN class=""&gt;The workaround is to duplicate the layers instead of using subtype group layers, but this doesn't seem relevant for a utility network.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 20:28:51 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/relationship-class-with-rules-appearance-in-arcgis/m-p/1701907#M103176</guid>
      <dc:creator>PierreloupDucroix</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2026-05-13T20:28:51Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

