<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic ROCm instead of CUDA for Deep Learning in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1572906#M91668</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Will Esri be opening up Deep Learning capabilities for&amp;nbsp;ROCm? NVIDIA cards are outrageously priced, if they are even available. We need to be able to run deep learning on AMD GPU that uses ROCm instead of proprietary NVIDIA CUDA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 20:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>UofSC_KevinHaynes</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2025-01-06T20:23:25Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>ROCm instead of CUDA for Deep Learning</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1572906#M91668</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Will Esri be opening up Deep Learning capabilities for&amp;nbsp;ROCm? NVIDIA cards are outrageously priced, if they are even available. We need to be able to run deep learning on AMD GPU that uses ROCm instead of proprietary NVIDIA CUDA.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 06 Jan 2025 20:23:25 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1572906#M91668</guid>
      <dc:creator>UofSC_KevinHaynes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-06T20:23:25Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ROCm instead of CUDA for Deep Learning</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1573012#M91673</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/767466"&gt;@UofSC_KevinHaynes&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;BR /&gt;Please log this as an Idea as well.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ideas generally get quick responses from Esri people if it touches a nerve or are interesting/complex/simple enough.&amp;nbsp; At minimum other users with similar issues/wants can upvote and you may see it accommodated sooner.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2025 04:27:48 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1573012#M91673</guid>
      <dc:creator>RTPL_AU</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-07T04:27:48Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: ROCm instead of CUDA for Deep Learning</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1575919#M91991</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for that, I'm doing it now.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2025 18:23:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rocm-instead-of-cuda-for-deep-learning/m-p/1575919#M91991</guid>
      <dc:creator>UofSC_KevinHaynes</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2025-01-15T18:23:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

