https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/did-pro-sql-change-where-attachment-relationship/m-p/1570290#M91431 <P>I have a big old legacy GIS environment that I manage - it's been built up to its current form from at least the 10.x days, and potentially the 9.x days.&nbsp; For as long as I can remember, any feature classes that have an attachment relationship has looked like: FC lives in dataset, attachment relationship class and table both live at the GDB level.</P><P>Recently I've been having an issue where feature classes that are updated with new attachments fail to collaborate in our distributed collaboration due to code":500,"message":"Unable to synchronize replica.","details":["Importing delta data changes failed."]</P><P>I do have a case open with esri and we found that copy-pasting one of the FCs in question into the same dataset fixes the issue - but what happens when you do this (create a new FC with attachments enabled in our up-to-date environment) is the attachment class now appears within the dataset (with the attachment table still living at the top level of the GDB).</P><P>I am wondering if this is a documented change - entirely possible it's been this way for years and I just haven't noticed.&nbsp; Any insight would be great.&nbsp; Thanks!</P> Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:59:49 GMT valenj88 2024-12-19T17:59:49Z https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/did-pro-sql-change-where-attachment-relationship/m-p/1570290#M91431 <P>I have a big old legacy GIS environment that I manage - it's been built up to its current form from at least the 10.x days, and potentially the 9.x days.&nbsp; For as long as I can remember, any feature classes that have an attachment relationship has looked like: FC lives in dataset, attachment relationship class and table both live at the GDB level.</P><P>Recently I've been having an issue where feature classes that are updated with new attachments fail to collaborate in our distributed collaboration due to code":500,"message":"Unable to synchronize replica.","details":["Importing delta data changes failed."]</P><P>I do have a case open with esri and we found that copy-pasting one of the FCs in question into the same dataset fixes the issue - but what happens when you do this (create a new FC with attachments enabled in our up-to-date environment) is the attachment class now appears within the dataset (with the attachment table still living at the top level of the GDB).</P><P>I am wondering if this is a documented change - entirely possible it's been this way for years and I just haven't noticed.&nbsp; Any insight would be great.&nbsp; Thanks!</P> Thu, 19 Dec 2024 17:59:49 GMT https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/did-pro-sql-change-where-attachment-relationship/m-p/1570290#M91431 valenj88 2024-12-19T17:59:49Z