<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1508335#M85845</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Graham.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to do something similar to what you're suggesting. ArcGIS Pro on Windows RDS direct on tin. (No hypervisor).&amp;nbsp; Can you tell me if you where successful?&amp;nbsp; Any gotchas or limitations that you can think of?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pete&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 23:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Kiwipeet</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-07-22T23:54:05Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351302#M75345</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Our IT team are planning to replace our shared remote desktop server (RDP host).&amp;nbsp; The new server will ONLY be used for people to connect and run ArcGIS Pro 3.2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The IT team would like some clarification around the specs of the new machine to make sure we get it right.&amp;nbsp; We have been unable to find specific answers to their questions in the ESRI documentation for which the specifications are for a single-user PC (&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/arcgis-pro-system-requirements.htm#GUID-B8F08895-1162-47A5-B2A0-2B8D5550155E" target="_blank"&gt;ArcGIS Pro 3.2 system requirements—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;).&amp;nbsp; Additionally, ESRI (Australia) support tells me "hardware specification recommendations for ArcGIS Pro ... falls outside the support we can provide" and "we are unable to provide information regarding hardware setups".&amp;nbsp; then they recommended posting here instead.&amp;nbsp; So here 'tis...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This host will service up to 10 users simultaneously.&amp;nbsp; So we need to figure out how much RAM, CPU, GPU, etc, is appropriate for this kind of use.&amp;nbsp; Please see our IT’s questions below:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;These are specs we are thinking of, but wanting to know what you either recommend or what other clients that you know are running in similar situations:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;HPE DL360 Gen10 Plus&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2x Xeon-S 4314 – 16 Cores @ 2.4Ghz per CPU (32 in total)&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;128GB DDR4 Ram&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;MR416i Controller&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;2x 960GB MU SATA SSD&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;SFP+ 10/25GbE NIC&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Nvidia T4 16GB GPU&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;* We are looking at setting up Hyper-V up on this server and run the Arc GIS Pro client on a virtual machine, being assigned 95% of the server resources as it will be the only VM.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;Additional questions:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is 32 core sufficient or possible too much given we have the GPU?&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Is there much benefit or disadvantage in getting a faster CPU cores or consider a trade off for faster cores, but say less of them, eg. 16 Cores in total at 3.2Ghz per core.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;128GB Ram, this will be perfectly fine for a few users, but will it be an issue for 6-10 users? – Or will the system mange what resources it has available?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Nvidia T4 GPU – This looks like a great card, any issues that you are aware of with this card for this purpose?&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P class="lia-indent-padding-left-30px"&gt;If we are storing [much] of our GIS share data on this server (around 2TB worth [in file geodatabases]), is there any reported benefits or disadvantages of using SATA SSD vs SAS SSD vs NVMe SSD?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are there any ArcGIS Pro users here with similar needs who can comment on what is working well for them?&amp;nbsp; Specifically for around 10 simultaneous users on the one machine.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 00:55:54 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351302#M75345</guid>
      <dc:creator>TI</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-20T00:55:54Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351372#M75350</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Additional resources that may be of help:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/faq-is-arcgis-pro-supported-in-virtualized-environments-000012325" target="_blank"&gt;https://support.esri.com/en-us/knowledge-base/faq-is-arcgis-pro-supported-in-virtualized-environments-000012325&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/virtualization-overview.htm" target="_blank"&gt;https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/get-started/virtualization-overview.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/3d-gis/3d-gis/virtualizing-arcgis-pro-nvidia-grid-vgpu-profiles/" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/arcgis-blog/products/3d-gis/3d-gis/virtualizing-arcgis-pro-nvidia-grid-vgpu-profiles/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/technical-papers/virtualization-of-arcgis-pro.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/technical-papers/virtualization-of-arcgis-pro.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://mediaspace.esri.com/media/t/1_vlf9kczc" target="_self"&gt;ArcGIS Pro: Virtualization On-Premises and in the Cloud &lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;This community leans more towards spatial users. It may be worthwhile posting from the opposite direction, in more IT-based forums, outlining the software requirements.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It also depends on what your users are doing. Workflows that hit the GPU - certain analysis tools and 3D work - will require more consideration even in a single user environment. The resources above draw a lot of parallels between ArcMap and ArcGIS Pro in terms of GPU usage.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 09:48:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351372#M75350</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristopherCounsell</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-20T09:48:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351411#M75352</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Here is another data point in terms of hardware for up-to 25 users:&amp;nbsp;&lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/pdf/hardware-partners/dell/dellvirtualizationappliance.pdf" target="_blank"&gt;https://www.esri.com/content/dam/esrisites/en-us/media/pdf/hardware-partners/dell/dellvirtualizationappliance.pdf&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Not apples-to-apples, but gives some context.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Nov 2023 12:31:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1351411#M75352</guid>
      <dc:creator>George_Thompson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-11-20T12:31:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1381435#M78680</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Is this a bare metal deployment..(no virtualisation) you may be able to use a top end workstation GPU&lt;BR /&gt;I've previously shared a Quadro RTX5000 with 5 users.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2024 03:39:36 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1381435#M78680</guid>
      <dc:creator>GrahamWood-HWC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-02-13T03:39:36Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Recommended Specs for Shared (RDP) ArcGIS Pro host with up to 10 simultaneous users</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1508335#M85845</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Graham.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'd like to do something similar to what you're suggesting. ArcGIS Pro on Windows RDS direct on tin. (No hypervisor).&amp;nbsp; Can you tell me if you where successful?&amp;nbsp; Any gotchas or limitations that you can think of?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Pete&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 22 Jul 2024 23:54:05 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/recommended-specs-for-shared-rdp-arcgis-pro-host/m-p/1508335#M85845</guid>
      <dc:creator>Kiwipeet</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-07-22T23:54:05Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

