<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation problems in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191393#M8472</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It turns out to be a file geodatabase issue again.&amp;nbsp; If 2.6.2 creates and processes the source file GDB, and then creates the MMPK, it will be bad.&amp;nbsp; If 2.5.2 creates and processes the file GDB, 2.6.2 will generate a good MMPK.&amp;nbsp; Since 2.6.x is already known to have multiple issues with file geodatabases, I don't see the value in opening another support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-10-12T19:48:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191390#M8469</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exhibit A:&amp;nbsp; MMPK generated by Pro 2.5.2:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="510562" class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/510562_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Exhibit B:&amp;nbsp; MMPK generated by Pro 2.6.1:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG __jive_id="510608" class="image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/510608_pastedImage_2.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Both are viewed using ArcGIS Runtime, and the problem is seen in 100.6, 7, and 8.&amp;nbsp; A 2.6.2 example is still cranking.&amp;nbsp; I'll let you know whether it makes a difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:00:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191390#M8469</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:00:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation screwed!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191391#M8470</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No difference at 2.6.2.&amp;nbsp; I'll try upgrading arcpy to the latest version and see if that makes a difference.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 19:32:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191391#M8470</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T19:32:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation screwed!</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191392#M8471</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;No dice.&amp;nbsp; Back to 2.5.2.&amp;nbsp; In the meantime, I'm putting together some sample data for Esri tech support.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2020 21:29:38 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191392#M8471</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-08T21:29:38Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191393#M8472</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;It turns out to be a file geodatabase issue again.&amp;nbsp; If 2.6.2 creates and processes the source file GDB, and then creates the MMPK, it will be bad.&amp;nbsp; If 2.5.2 creates and processes the file GDB, 2.6.2 will generate a good MMPK.&amp;nbsp; Since 2.6.x is already known to have multiple issues with file geodatabases, I don't see the value in opening another support case.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2020 19:48:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/191393#M8472</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-10-12T19:48:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/1010959#M35205</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;FYI, I'm still seeing the problem at 2.7.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2020 16:27:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/1010959#M35205</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-12-18T16:27:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pro 2.6.1:  MMPK Annotation problems</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/1016336#M35949</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;BUG-000136715 &lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:56:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pro-2-6-1-mmpk-annotation-problems/m-p/1016336#M35949</guid>
      <dc:creator>MarkCederholm</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-01-13T13:56:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

