<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Increasing efficiency of Tabulate Intersection by splitting polygon feature with grid in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/increasing-efficiency-of-tabulate-intersection-by/m-p/1418797#M82739</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently attempting to determine the proportion of area within a large number of buffers (zones) taken up by polygons (features). I dissolved the polygons into one large feature, and used Tabulate Intersection, but this proved quite inefficient.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read a previous post recommending that the polygon(s) be split into "pieces" (e.g. using a grid) to make the process more efficient. Here is the post: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/tabulate-intersection-reading-more-features-than/td-p/1094063" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/tabulate-intersection-reading-more-features-than/td-p/1094063&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have done is used the extent of the area with the buffers and polygon feature to create a grid (currently running), with the plan of running a tabulate intersection with the buffers as my zone and the grids with the polygon "pieces" as the input. However, I am open to alternatives!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warm regards 〳 ° ▾ ° 〵&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 16:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>ChristopherDennison</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2024-05-03T16:10:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Increasing efficiency of Tabulate Intersection by splitting polygon feature with grid</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/increasing-efficiency-of-tabulate-intersection-by/m-p/1418797#M82739</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Good afternoon!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am currently attempting to determine the proportion of area within a large number of buffers (zones) taken up by polygons (features). I dissolved the polygons into one large feature, and used Tabulate Intersection, but this proved quite inefficient.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I read a previous post recommending that the polygon(s) be split into "pieces" (e.g. using a grid) to make the process more efficient. Here is the post: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/tabulate-intersection-reading-more-features-than/td-p/1094063" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/tabulate-intersection-reading-more-features-than/td-p/1094063&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I have done is used the extent of the area with the buffers and polygon feature to create a grid (currently running), with the plan of running a tabulate intersection with the buffers as my zone and the grids with the polygon "pieces" as the input. However, I am open to alternatives!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any guidance would be greatly appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Warm regards 〳 ° ▾ ° 〵&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Fri, 03 May 2024 16:10:15 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/increasing-efficiency-of-tabulate-intersection-by/m-p/1418797#M82739</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChristopherDennison</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2024-05-03T16:10:15Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

