<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Viewshed irregularities in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179991#M7991</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;lots of options here, any particular settings you are using?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/interactive-viewshed-basics.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/interactive-viewshed-basics.htm"&gt;Interactive viewshed basics—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and at the very bottom there is this note...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #828282; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Visual inaccuracies can appear as the viewshed's analysis range ratio increases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2020-04-12T16:11:59Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Viewshed irregularities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179990#M7990</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm trying to find carry out a viewshed analysis but am not able to get consistent results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Having tried and failed with viewshed and viewshed2 I discovered interactive viewshed analysis in ArcGIS Pro 2.5.0. This appeared promising but having input an observer offset of 10m and using the Ordnance Survey's 50cm DSM as the ground layer I was surprised to see the viewshed change as I zoomed the camera out (using the "C" shortcut to change the cursor to explorer mode). The ground layer uses EPSG: 27700 for the coordinate system and EPSG: 5701 for the vertical coordinate system. I'd like to know why this is happening as it makes any output from this tool unusable.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;IMG class="jive-emoji image-2 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488278_viewshed2.gif" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 15:40:02 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179990#M7990</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oliver_Burdekin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-12T15:40:02Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed irregularities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179991#M7991</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;lots of options here, any particular settings you are using?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/interactive-viewshed-basics.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/interactive-viewshed-basics.htm"&gt;Interactive viewshed basics—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;and at the very bottom there is this note...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="color: #828282; background-color: #ffffff;"&gt;Visual inaccuracies can appear as the viewshed's analysis range ratio increases.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:11:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179991#M7991</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-12T16:11:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed irregularities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179992#M7992</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the quick response Dan. The settings I'm using are below:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;IMG class="image-1 jive-image" src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/488315_pastedImage_1.png" /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;It seems that the tool is working off the pyramids rendered rather than the actual data values.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:25:37 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179992#M7992</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oliver_Burdekin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-12T16:25:37Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed irregularities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179993#M7993</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Other than the statement, that it takes "a raster approach", there is nothing I can find, other than the exploratory videos... sorry&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/exploratory-analysis-how-to-videos.htm" title="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/mapping/exploratory-analysis/exploratory-analysis-how-to-videos.htm"&gt;Exploratory analysis how-to videos—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 16:58:21 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179993#M7993</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson_Retired</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-12T16:58:21Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Viewshed irregularities</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179994#M7994</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for trying Dan. I'm struggling to think of a use case for a "sometimes" accurate analysis tool. Do you have any experience with the viewshed or viewshed 2 geoprocessing tools? I tried both prior to using the interactive one but had very mixed results. &lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2020 17:46:30 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/viewshed-irregularities/m-p/179994#M7994</guid>
      <dc:creator>Oliver_Burdekin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2020-04-12T17:46:30Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

