<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Pixel classification with deep learning parameter optimisation in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixel-classification-with-deep-learning-parameter/m-p/1321508#M72376</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The performance I'm getting from the &lt;A href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=afd124844ba84da69c2c533d4af10a58" target="_self"&gt;Land Cover Classification (Sentinel-2) pretrained model&amp;nbsp;in ArcGIS Pro seems to be well below what it could be.&amp;nbsp; So I would like any help on parameter optimisation for the model.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are my outputs vs. an example from Esri.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On top is an example I'm looking at (King Island). &amp;nbsp;On the bottom is an Esri example from here &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f94130190164205961bcba69264a187" href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f94130190164205961bcba69264a187" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;Land Cover Classification (arcgis.com). &amp;nbsp;As you can see, the Kind Island example is not identifying much correctly at all, except for the ocean border on the right, &amp;nbsp;It's not identifying any agricultural land, and it's finding water bodies where none exist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The performance of this model is supposed to be around ~80%, but for King Island the accuracy is much lower with &amp;lt;50% of pixels identified correctly. &amp;nbsp; At the moment the plan is to fine-tune the model with some labelled training data, but I also feel that perhaps the model parameters (padding, batch size, tile size) are not configured properly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anybody can point me towards what might be causing this poor performance, or how to improve it, that would be amazing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/78890iEC6A709AB8E867FC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" alt="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 06:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Alice_</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-08-23T06:36:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pixel classification with deep learning parameter optimisation</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixel-classification-with-deep-learning-parameter/m-p/1321508#M72376</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;The performance I'm getting from the &lt;A href="https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=afd124844ba84da69c2c533d4af10a58" target="_self"&gt;Land Cover Classification (Sentinel-2) pretrained model&amp;nbsp;in ArcGIS Pro seems to be well below what it could be.&amp;nbsp; So I would like any help on parameter optimisation for the model.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;These are my outputs vs. an example from Esri.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;On top is an example I'm looking at (King Island). &amp;nbsp;On the bottom is an Esri example from here &amp;gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;A title="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f94130190164205961bcba69264a187" href="https://storymaps.arcgis.com/stories/6f94130190164205961bcba69264a187" target="_blank" rel="noreferrer noopener"&gt;Land Cover Classification (arcgis.com). &amp;nbsp;As you can see, the Kind Island example is not identifying much correctly at all, except for the ocean border on the right, &amp;nbsp;It's not identifying any agricultural land, and it's finding water bodies where none exist.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The performance of this model is supposed to be around ~80%, but for King Island the accuracy is much lower with &amp;lt;50% of pixels identified correctly. &amp;nbsp; At the moment the plan is to fine-tune the model with some labelled training data, but I also feel that perhaps the model parameters (padding, batch size, tile size) are not configured properly.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If anybody can point me towards what might be causing this poor performance, or how to improve it, that would be amazing.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/78890iEC6A709AB8E867FC/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" alt="Alice__0-1692772287059.jpeg" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Aug 2023 06:36:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixel-classification-with-deep-learning-parameter/m-p/1321508#M72376</guid>
      <dc:creator>Alice_</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-08-23T06:36:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

