<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Spatial Join cardinality relationships in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308763#M71115</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;OK Dan, thanks for answering Question #2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about Question #1; I know there is a difference in an Attribute Join,&amp;nbsp; but is there really a difference in a Spatial Join? ...I ask because some data I'm using looks more like a M:1 or M:M, not a 1:M?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Craig_Eissler_Iceman</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:30:33Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Spatial Join cardinality relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308650#M71098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;There are two Spatial Join tools: Data Management version and Analysis version.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;1. Regardless of the above tool used, is a One-to-Many, Many-to-One, or Many-to-Many&amp;nbsp;situation with my data all considered a "One-to-Many" cardinality relationship with a Spatial Join? ...seems that way to me&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;2. That said, I know I can specify this in Analysis tool version. But, is there a reason why I cannot in the Data Management tool version?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 15:45:49 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308650#M71098</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig_Eissler_Iceman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T15:45:49Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Join cardinality relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308723#M71113</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/add-spatial-join.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Add Spatial Join (Data Management)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;it only says...&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;join_operation&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;(Optional)&lt;BR /&gt;This parameter is not supported. All joins will be performed as a one-to-one join. If you are using positional arguments in Python, use a None type, an empty string ("" or ''), or the JOIN_ONE_TO_ONE keyword.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To achieve a one-to-many join when the output is created in an output feature class, use the Spatial Join tool.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 18:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308723#M71113</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T18:32:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Join cardinality relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308763#M71115</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK Dan, thanks for answering Question #2.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What about Question #1; I know there is a difference in an Attribute Join,&amp;nbsp; but is there really a difference in a Spatial Join? ...I ask because some data I'm using looks more like a M:1 or M:M, not a 1:M?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:30:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308763#M71115</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig_Eissler_Iceman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:30:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Join cardinality relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308768#M71116</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;as for M:1&amp;nbsp; think of points in polygon&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; 1:M&amp;nbsp; polygon contains points&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp; M:M&amp;nbsp; overlapping polygons with points therein&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:36:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308768#M71116</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:36:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Spatial Join cardinality relationships</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308779#M71119</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;OK thanks for that tip.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;So the tool just classifies all three as 1:M for some reason?&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 17 Jul 2023 19:44:58 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/spatial-join-cardinality-relationships/m-p/1308779#M71119</guid>
      <dc:creator>Craig_Eissler_Iceman</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-17T19:44:58Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

