<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Rescale by Function - why is scale double not integer? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rescale-by-function-why-is-scale-double-not/m-p/1306069#M70848</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering if anyone can explain to me why my output raster from Rescale By Function analysis tool gives values as a "double" and not as an "integer" like the input raster?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am rescaling a weighted sum output raster to a scale of 1-9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know what the minimum and maximum possibly values could have been for my weighted sum raster.&amp;nbsp; At the moment my weighted sum results does not include the minimum and maximum possible score values so I am using the Rescale by Function tool to rescale the results based to a scale of 1-9.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the "Linear" transformation function I have specified what the minimum and maximum scores would be and stated that the minimum score be scaled to 1 and the maximum score be scaled to 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand I could use weighted overlay which does a similar thing and rescales the resulting raster to a specified scale. However, I would like to understand the differences and specifically why "rescale by function" gives me values of e.g. &lt;SPAN&gt;6.210527 integer, whereas weighted overlay output would value this as 6 and the output scale I have chosen (along with input raster) have all been "double"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 09:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>EBRWE</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-07-06T09:52:27Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Rescale by Function - why is scale double not integer?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rescale-by-function-why-is-scale-double-not/m-p/1306069#M70848</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I'm wondering if anyone can explain to me why my output raster from Rescale By Function analysis tool gives values as a "double" and not as an "integer" like the input raster?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I am rescaling a weighted sum output raster to a scale of 1-9.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I know what the minimum and maximum possibly values could have been for my weighted sum raster.&amp;nbsp; At the moment my weighted sum results does not include the minimum and maximum possible score values so I am using the Rescale by Function tool to rescale the results based to a scale of 1-9.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Using the "Linear" transformation function I have specified what the minimum and maximum scores would be and stated that the minimum score be scaled to 1 and the maximum score be scaled to 9&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I understand I could use weighted overlay which does a similar thing and rescales the resulting raster to a specified scale. However, I would like to understand the differences and specifically why "rescale by function" gives me values of e.g. &lt;SPAN&gt;6.210527 integer, whereas weighted overlay output would value this as 6 and the output scale I have chosen (along with input raster) have all been "double"&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN&gt;Thanks&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 06 Jul 2023 09:52:27 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/rescale-by-function-why-is-scale-double-not/m-p/1306069#M70848</guid>
      <dc:creator>EBRWE</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-07-06T09:52:27Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

