<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153948#M6906</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;The Reviewer extension covers the full spectrum of QA/QC without having to write custom code. QA/QC requires more than automated validation. Attribute rules do not solve the need for visual review or error life cycle management, the Reviewer extension supports automated validation and all other QA/QC operations with an integrated and seamless process. Attribute Rules can cover automated validation to some extent, and at the cost of knowledge in writing and maintaining arcade scripts.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 20:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>FranciscoPerez1</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-05-22T20:51:47Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153945#M6903</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using the Data Reviewer extension to create and evaluate validation rules for our editing our features.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Create validation rules as Attribute Rules in the geodatabase seems to do largely the same.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What is the added value of the Data Reviewer extension, or in other words, can we just save the license and go with attribute rules?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 12:01:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153945#M6903</guid>
      <dc:creator>CalinArens1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-21T12:01:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153946#M6904</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;+ &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/space/2094"&gt;Data Reviewer&lt;/A&gt;‌&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 May 2019 12:47:22 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153946#M6904</guid>
      <dc:creator>KoryKramer</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-21T12:47:22Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153947#M6905</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;The value add depends on how much your organization can invest in creating (&lt;EM&gt;and maintaining&lt;/EM&gt;) custom code to replace data quality workflows currently implemented using Data Reviewer’s configurable tools.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Starting with the 2.3 release, Data Reviewer’s automated &lt;A href="http://desktop.arcgis.com/en/arcmap/latest/extensions/data-reviewer/checks-in-data-reviewer.htm"&gt;checks&lt;/A&gt; will be migrated to support &lt;STRONG&gt;Attribute rule&lt;/STRONG&gt; constraint and validation &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/data/geodatabases/overview/an-overview-of-attribute-rules.htm"&gt;workflows&lt;/A&gt;. Check migration will happen over a series of releases due to the number of checks to be migrated and are prioritized based on customer frequency of use. (Note: You can influence this prioritization by participating in our customer &lt;A _jive_internal="true" href="https://community.esri.com/community/gis/solutions/data-reviewer/blog/2019/04/24/calling-all-data-reviewer-users"&gt;survey&lt;/A&gt;!)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Here are some items to consider:&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Implementation and maintenance costs&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Implementation of a Data Reviewer-based Attribute rule does not require specialized programming skills and can often be done by a subject matter expert with a good understanding of the organization’s data quality requirements. This results in lower implementation and maintenance costs when compared to custom code.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(Actually, there are whole host of things to consider when implementing a system based on customized commercial off-the-shelf software (COTS). For reference, here is an Esri &lt;A href="https://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/cots-based-approach-enterprise.pdf"&gt;white paper&lt;/A&gt; (slightly dated) that outlines patterns in COTS-based deployments.)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Functional equivalency&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;Does Arcade support the data validation requirements that are currently implement with Data Reviewer checks? Depending on the Data Reviewer checks that are used in your system this may not be an issue.&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Operational efficiency&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;Support for Data Reviewer-based validation workflows is planned for the &lt;STRONG&gt;Q1 2020&lt;/STRONG&gt; release. In testing, Data Reviewer’s validation engine significantly outperforms equivalent Arcade-based validations. This improves operational efficiency that results in lower operating costs.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 19:15:04 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153947#M6905</guid>
      <dc:creator>JayCary</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-22T19:15:04Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153948#M6906</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;SPAN style="font-size: 11.0pt;"&gt;The Reviewer extension covers the full spectrum of QA/QC without having to write custom code. QA/QC requires more than automated validation. Attribute rules do not solve the need for visual review or error life cycle management, the Reviewer extension supports automated validation and all other QA/QC operations with an integrated and seamless process. Attribute Rules can cover automated validation to some extent, and at the cost of knowledge in writing and maintaining arcade scripts.&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 May 2019 20:51:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153948#M6906</guid>
      <dc:creator>FranciscoPerez1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-22T20:51:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: What does Data Reviewer add to Attribute Rules?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153949#M6907</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the answers, I now have a feel for what the products are meant for.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;We have been using Data Reviewer&amp;nbsp;as data validator in a web app, with both checks on a certain version and nightly validation for the entire dataset. I am thinking for this use case, we might as well use attribute rules, which actually also provide visual review layers in the feature service. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 27 May 2019 07:33:19 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/what-does-data-reviewer-add-to-attribute-rules/m-p/153949#M6907</guid>
      <dc:creator>CalinArens1</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-05-27T07:33:19Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

