<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Pixelated hillshade in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274932#M67553</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Another thing I would examine is the coordinate system. Is your DEM in a geographic or projected coordinate system?&amp;nbsp; Best practice is to &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/project-raster.htm" target="_self"&gt;reproject your raster&lt;/A&gt; from geographic to projected before running the GP tool on it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 19:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2023-04-03T19:44:18Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Pixelated hillshade</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274743#M67527</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Downloaded USGS DEM and produced a Hillshade using the spatial analysis tool. For some reason, certain areas are turning out very pixelated and other areas are fine. Multidirectional hillshade produced the same result.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 15:59:10 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274743#M67527</guid>
      <dc:creator>Redwood_SC</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-03T15:59:10Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pixelated hillshade</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274782#M67532</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi,&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;A possible solution to this issue could be to adjust the settings of the hillshade tool, such as the azimuth and altitude angles, or changing the Z-factor to adjust the vertical exaggeration. It may also be helpful to check if the input USGS DEM file has any missing or incorrect data that could be causing the pixelation in certain areas. Additionally, using other data sources or sources with higher resolution may also produce better results.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 04 Apr 2023 07:53:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274782#M67532</guid>
      <dc:creator>Omar_A</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-04T07:53:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Pixelated hillshade</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274932#M67553</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Another thing I would examine is the coordinate system. Is your DEM in a geographic or projected coordinate system?&amp;nbsp; Best practice is to &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/project-raster.htm" target="_self"&gt;reproject your raster&lt;/A&gt; from geographic to projected before running the GP tool on it.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2023 19:44:18 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/pixelated-hillshade/m-p/1274932#M67553</guid>
      <dc:creator>Robert_LeClair</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-04-03T19:44:18Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

