<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: The display bug of same Multidirectional Hillshade in same range scales in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193842#M57482</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;You will have to use the same export properties as I mentioned in your other thread.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your samples don't have the same min and max values, they will display differently if the image is stretched (or similar operation)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-07-20T10:20:00Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The display bug of same Multidirectional Hillshade in same range scales</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193821#M57478</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I think the display of Multidirectional Hillshade (MH) has some bugs, in a full area map, the MH obtained directly by Raster Functions and the *.tif file obtained by exporting or copying this MH (by Raster Functions), the display effect is not the same (Figure 1 and 2).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;When I enlarge the page to show only a local area, the two MHs are exactly the same (Figure 3). This leads to a significant decrease in display quality when I draw my study area map (because the directly generated MH is a temporary file that is automatically cleaned up by the Windows system, as I mentioned in this question: &lt;A href="https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/could-i-directly-save-a-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193806#M57476)" target="_blank"&gt;https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/could-i-directly-save-a-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193806#M57476)&lt;/A&gt;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I sincerely hope that you can find a slightly larger area (probably greater than 50,000 sq km) to test this MH display and find the problem and fix it. (Maybe this is because the temporary&amp;nbsp; MH did not create the pyramid, but it shows a better result)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="AlvisDou_1-1658304395949.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/46257i9AA67B58CADC3F57/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="AlvisDou_1-1658304395949.png" alt="AlvisDou_1-1658304395949.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="AlvisDou_4-1658304485763.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/46260iA44F66E2B50EEB42/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="AlvisDou_4-1658304485763.png" alt="AlvisDou_4-1658304485763.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="AlvisDou_5-1658304876625.png" style="width: 400px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/46261iB3E11EBC243F0A65/image-size/medium?v=v2&amp;amp;px=400" role="button" title="AlvisDou_5-1658304876625.png" alt="AlvisDou_5-1658304876625.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 08:20:57 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193821#M57478</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlvisDou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T08:20:57Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The display bug of same Multidirectional Hillshade in same range scales</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193842#M57482</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;You will have to use the same export properties as I mentioned in your other thread.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;If your samples don't have the same min and max values, they will display differently if the image is stretched (or similar operation)&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:20:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193842#M57482</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T10:20:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: The display bug of same Multidirectional Hillshade in same range scales</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193845#M57485</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the answer, I don't think it has anything to do with statistical values, please see my other reply.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 10:28:26 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/the-display-bug-of-same-multidirectional-hillshade/m-p/1193845#M57485</guid>
      <dc:creator>AlvisDou</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-07-20T10:28:26Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

