<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Set M-values as distance: Multipart M-values are set in descending order in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1156004#M53098</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set as Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt; seems to try to minimize the distance. In your second case, V2 is closer to V4 than to V3, so it continues the route that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That feels kinda wrong, but maybe there are good reasons for that behavior, I don't know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workaround:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set as Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set From/To&lt;/STRONG&gt;, using the highest M value as &lt;STRONG&gt;To&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>JohannesLindner</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-03-22T09:03:12Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Bug: Set M-values as distance — Multipart M-values are set in descending order</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1155710#M53049</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;I have a multipart polyline in an ArcGIS Pro 2.9.2 feature class:&lt;BR /&gt;(NAD83 UTM 17N)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bud_1-1647871715101.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36840iBB31CE32148AA895/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Bud_1-1647871715101.png" alt="Bud_1-1647871715101.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I can set the M-values to the cumulative distance of the line by using the &lt;STRONG&gt;Set As Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt; tool (setting "Starting M" to zero):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bud_2-1647871823474.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36841i20987373CD5B6150/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Bud_2-1647871823474.png" alt="Bud_2-1647871823474.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;That works as expected.&amp;nbsp;Part #2's M-values are in the correct order (ascending).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bud_3-1647872013325.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36842i6AFF4AF1BCF4A78E/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Bud_3-1647872013325.png" alt="Bud_3-1647872013325.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;BR /&gt;However, if I do a different test, the results are unexpected:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;A href="https://i.stack.imgur.com/sCsnL.png" target="_self"&gt;Drop the measures.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Try a slightly different feature:&lt;BR /&gt;Change the X-coordinate of &lt;U&gt;part #1, vertex 2&lt;/U&gt;...from 130 meters to 135 meters.&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;Re-do the test:&lt;BR /&gt;Set the M-values to the cumulative distance of the line by using the &lt;STRONG&gt;Set As Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt; tool (setting "Starting M" to zero).&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;&lt;P&gt;Now, part #2's M-values are in the &lt;STRONG&gt;in&lt;/STRONG&gt;correct order (descending):&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="Bud_4-1647872911983.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/36843i288F268EA6A6F675/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="Bud_4-1647872911983.png" alt="Bud_4-1647872911983.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Question:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Why are the M-values in the &lt;STRONG&gt;in&lt;/STRONG&gt;correct order? (descending)&lt;BR /&gt;I would expect the M-value order to be the same as the vertex index's order (ascending).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2023 04:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1155710#M53049</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2023-01-25T04:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set M-values as distance: Multipart M-values are set in descending order</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1156004#M53098</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set as Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt; seems to try to minimize the distance. In your second case, V2 is closer to V4 than to V3, so it continues the route that way.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;That feels kinda wrong, but maybe there are good reasons for that behavior, I don't know.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Workaround:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;UL&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set as Distance&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;LI&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Set From/To&lt;/STRONG&gt;, using the highest M value as &lt;STRONG&gt;To&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/LI&gt;&lt;/UL&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 22 Mar 2022 09:03:12 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1156004#M53098</guid>
      <dc:creator>JohannesLindner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-03-22T09:03:12Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Set M-values as distance: Multipart M-values are set in descending order</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1163080#M53884</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Esri confirmed it's a defect: BUG-000148390.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Apr 2022 15:44:47 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/bug-set-m-values-as-distance-multipart-m-values/m-p/1163080#M53884</guid>
      <dc:creator>Bud</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-04-11T15:44:47Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

