<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge? in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123514#M5207</link>
    <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcMap, when I merge two street segments, there is one created from it, and the two old segments go away. Pro is keeping the two old segments and adding a new merged feature in addition to the old ones.&amp;nbsp; I have to go back into the data now to remove the old ones, which is an extra step.&amp;nbsp; I realize that maybe not everyone would need the old features to go away, like I do, so it would be nice to have a toggle for "Keep/Remove" old features as well as the one for "Use Template."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>KimJones</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2019-01-09T17:13:34Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123514#M5207</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;In ArcMap, when I merge two street segments, there is one created from it, and the two old segments go away. Pro is keeping the two old segments and adding a new merged feature in addition to the old ones.&amp;nbsp; I have to go back into the data now to remove the old ones, which is an extra step.&amp;nbsp; I realize that maybe not everyone would need the old features to go away, like I do, so it would be nice to have a toggle for "Keep/Remove" old features as well as the one for "Use Template."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:13:34 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123514#M5207</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T17:13:34Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123515#M5208</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;What version of Pro are you working in where you see this behavior?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tested the Merge tool in Pro 2.2.1 and I do not see this behavior.&amp;nbsp; I am using a file gdb.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;As such, what is the data source of your street segment data?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Tested the same scenario in a different file gdb in Pro 2.3 Beta and the old segments were not kept as was the case for you.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Can you try testing this tool in another aprx and also from a different data source to see if it behaves any differently?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 17:58:23 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123515#M5208</guid>
      <dc:creator>MichaelVolz</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T17:58:23Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123516#M5209</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm using v 2.2.4.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 19:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123516#M5209</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T19:17:16Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123517#M5210</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;I'm going to use my laptop to test it on an older version, as that one is still loaded with 2.0.&amp;nbsp; I only use the laptop when I get called to the EOC, so it doesn't get updated often. It's doing system updates now, so I wait.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;The street data is in our sde database.&amp;nbsp; We are a municipality and create the data ourselves.&amp;nbsp; I had a new section of street that was opened last week and just found out about it.&amp;nbsp; I needed to merge that new 'closed' segment with the adjacent 'open' segment to form one 'open' segment.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Glad to hear it isn't doing that in the Pro 2.3 Beta version.&amp;nbsp; I'm looking forward to getting that version for other reasons, and this will just add to them.&amp;nbsp; &lt;IMG src="https://community.esri.com/legacyfs/online/emoticons/happy.png" /&gt;&amp;nbsp; May not even need to concern myself with this issue if it's not there in 2.3. Thank you!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:41:35 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123517#M5210</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T20:41:35Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123518#M5211</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Hi Kim,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Along with Michael's suggestions, I want to confirm if you are using the "Existing Feature"&amp;nbsp;option of the Merge tool (instead of the New Feature option).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A class="link-titled" href="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/editing/merge-features-into-one-feature.htm#GUID-8039EE21-E7F7-4B7C-BE77-E5E3FECBAD21" title="http://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/help/editing/merge-features-into-one-feature.htm#GUID-8039EE21-E7F7-4B7C-BE77-E5E3FECBAD21"&gt;Merge features into one feature—ArcGIS Pro | ArcGIS Desktop&lt;/A&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;-Scott&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 20:48:43 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123518#M5211</guid>
      <dc:creator>Scott_Harris</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T20:48:43Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Why does Pro keep the old segments when using merge?</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123519#M5212</link>
      <description>&lt;HTML&gt;&lt;HEAD&gt;&lt;/HEAD&gt;&lt;BODY&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ahhh...there's a choice...I see that now.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Ok, so I just finished my test in 2.0, as Michael suggested, and it did as he said - what ArcMap does: takes out the old features.&amp;nbsp; I noticed it also doesn't have the toggle for "Use Template."&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I closed that down without saving and came back to my desk comp with Pro 2.2.4, and checked on your suggestion, Scott.&amp;nbsp; The merge tool opens with Existing as the default.&amp;nbsp; I clicked New Feature, thinking it did what I needed.&amp;nbsp; Now I know - use Existing!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thank you both so much!&amp;nbsp; I've just been using Pro for a few weeks now, so I'm still learning all the little nuances.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;SO much to learn!&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BODY&gt;&lt;/HTML&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 09 Jan 2019 22:09:20 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/why-does-pro-keep-the-old-segments-when-using/m-p/123519#M5212</guid>
      <dc:creator>KimJones</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2019-01-09T22:09:20Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

