<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Export Training Data For Deep Learning The Difference In Brightness of Output Files in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139776#M50857</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;you should try the comparison without any clip or stretch is what I was suggesting since the range of values in each image will determine the high and low values and over what range to make adjustments&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 12:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2022-02-02T12:48:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Export Training Data For Deep Learning The Difference In Brightness of Output Files</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139583#M50835</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hello there,&lt;BR /&gt;When I try to use the Image Analyst tool Export Traning Data For Deep Learning, the exported tile outputs' come with an arranged level that their brightness is exaggerated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;What I mean is that the output tiles' color balance or luminance differentiation doesn't suit the original raster file. This is not a big issue since I examined the results are not being affected too much after I executed sample tasks for my deep learning needs. However, I would like to know what is the exact agent that is causing shifts in the brightness of the exported tile files.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I tried all configurations including extension modes, metadata format, reference system. All are leading the same output.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I added a sample region that clarifies the issue as you may be interested to get further info.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 21:20:59 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139583#M50835</guid>
      <dc:creator>sukruburakcetin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-01T21:20:59Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Export Training Data For Deep Learning The Difference In Brightness of Output Files</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139641#M50841</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;what symbology are you using for the layer?&amp;nbsp; Do they look the same un clipped/stretched assuming you are using rgb and default symbology&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 01 Feb 2022 23:15:32 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139641#M50841</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-01T23:15:32Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Export Training Data For Deep Learning The Difference In Brightness of Output Files</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139744#M50849</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;First of all thank you so much dear&amp;nbsp;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/215600"&gt;@DanPatterson&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;To clarify the issue as much as detailed, I used 4 bands .tif imaginary and simply extracted the first 3 bands separately, then used composite band tool to reunite them without making any changes in symbology(default settings).&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Then, I used Export Training Data for Deep Learning Tool as with the setup you mentioned in your previous message.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;In short, the symbology I used has a percent clip stretch type (min 0,500 to max 0,500) with 0,9 gamma.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;After your saying, this might be the issue, but when I want to display the 3 band composited image and compare it with the one that has 4 bands(original specimen), the color balance looks the same. 4 bands original imaginary has also same symbology(percent clip stretch type min 0,500 and max 0,500)&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;layer_symbology visual is added to the attachments to make it more pronounced. Thanks in advance.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 09:36:53 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139744#M50849</guid>
      <dc:creator>sukruburakcetin</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T09:36:53Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Export Training Data For Deep Learning The Difference In Brightness of Output Files</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139776#M50857</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;you should try the comparison without any clip or stretch is what I was suggesting since the range of values in each image will determine the high and low values and over what range to make adjustments&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 02 Feb 2022 12:48:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/export-training-data-for-deep-learning-the/m-p/1139776#M50857</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2022-02-02T12:48:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

