<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>topic Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up in ArcGIS Pro Questions</title>
    <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128417#M49299</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;are all your Project locations in 1 file? and the sensitive areas in another?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you interested in the actual area? or just whether there is overlap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/analysis/tabulate-intersection.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Tabulate Intersection (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;should not be overlooked either in part of your analysis or in its entirety&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
    <dc:date>2021-12-22T19:14:40Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128398#M49295</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I ran a Union between project locations and sensitive environmental areas. I then filtered out only the project sections from the Union output. The table looks like this:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;span class="lia-inline-image-display-wrapper lia-image-align-inline" image-alt="image001.png" style="width: 999px;"&gt;&lt;img src="https://community.esri.com/t5/image/serverpage/image-id/30245i73DFB5BBD510AA0D/image-size/large?v=v2&amp;amp;px=999" role="button" title="image001.png" alt="image001.png" /&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My goal is to automate this portion of cleaning up the data with either python or model builder within Pro.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Goal:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- remove all fields except Title and FID_'s&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then remove the FID_ from the field name&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then replace all values -1 or below with a blank field&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then generate a report with the table in PDF format&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;My gut tells me python is the right approach and will have more tools for fine tuning this. I may be wrong.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Any input is much appreciated.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 18:38:33 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128398#M49295</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisSpadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T18:38:33Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128415#M49298</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;a href="https://community.esri.com/t5/user/viewprofilepage/user-id/100938"&gt;@ChrisSpadi&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;this can be accomplished using arcpy:&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- remove all fields except Title and FID_'s&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/delete-field.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Delete Field&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then remove the FID_ from the field name&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt; &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.8/tool-reference/data-management/alter-field-properties.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Alter Field&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then replace all values -1 or below with a blank field&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/data-management/calculate-field.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Calculate Field&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;- then generate a report with the table in PD&amp;nbsp; --&amp;gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/2.8/arcpy/mapping/report-class.htm" target="_blank" rel="noopener"&gt;Report&lt;/A&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The report template must first exist in the Pro project&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:12:29 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128415#M49298</guid>
      <dc:creator>JakeSkinner</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T19:12:29Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128417#M49299</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;are all your Project locations in 1 file? and the sensitive areas in another?&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Are you interested in the actual area? or just whether there is overlap&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="https://pro.arcgis.com/en/pro-app/latest/tool-reference/analysis/tabulate-intersection.htm" target="_blank"&gt;Tabulate Intersection (Analysis)—ArcGIS Pro | Documentation&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;should not be overlooked either in part of your analysis or in its entirety&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:14:40 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128417#M49299</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T19:14:40Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128433#M49302</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;Hi Dan,&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;Thanks for the response. This tool looks useful for 2 fc's but all my data is multiple fc's within a GDB and map.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 19:57:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128433#M49302</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisSpadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T19:57:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128447#M49306</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;too bad, I suppose consolidating the disparate bits is out of the question, it seems like a good candidate&lt;/P&gt;&lt;P&gt;I don't suppose your environmentally sensitive areas are in one file? since a batch merge would take care of getting all your "projects" together&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Dec 2021 20:36:39 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1128447#M49306</guid>
      <dc:creator>DanPatterson</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-22T20:36:39Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Re: Union Tool Output Clean Up</title>
      <link>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1129173#M49390</link>
      <description>&lt;P&gt;I ended up building a model with some of these tools.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 28 Dec 2021 15:40:01 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid>https://community.esri.com/t5/arcgis-pro-questions/union-tool-output-clean-up/m-p/1129173#M49390</guid>
      <dc:creator>ChrisSpadi</dc:creator>
      <dc:date>2021-12-28T15:40:01Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

